Black Agenda Report
Black Agenda Report
News, commentary and analysis from the black left.

  • Home
  • Africa
  • African America
  • Education
  • Environment
  • International
  • Media and Culture
  • Political Economy
  • Radio
  • US Politics
  • War and Empire
  • omnibus

NYT Joins Campaign to Purge the Term, “White Monopoly Capital” in South Africa
Glen Ford, BAR executive editor
08 Feb 2018
NYT Joins Campaign to Purge the Term, “White Monopoly Capital” in South Africa
NYT Joins Campaign to Purge the Term, “White Monopoly Capital in South Africa”

“The Times fingered a British p.r. outfit as the culprit that popularized the belief that ‘white monopoly capital’ must be overthrown to complete the unfinished South African revolution.”

The New York Times, the world’s premier journalistic purveyor of a “fake,” imperial, and profoundly white capitalist world view -- masquerading as all the news that’s fit to print -- wants us to believe that a now-bankrupt London-based public relations firm is behind South Africa’s regime-shaking debate over the rule of “white monopoly capital.”

It’s an amazing claim, that could only be put forward with a straight face by an institution marinated in centuries of white supremacy, whose operatives can perceive only fellow white hands and minds as makers of history -- or even coiners of useful terms.

In a February 4 business section article titled, “How Bell Pottinger, P.R. Firm for Despots and Rogues, Met Its End in South Africa,” the Times fingered the British p.r. outfit as the culprit that popularized the belief that “white monopoly capital” must be overthrown to complete the unfinished South African revolution. Bell Pottinger worked for the Gupta brothers, three businessmen from India that are widely believed to have corruptly “captured” the government of President Jacob Zuma for their own enrichment. The Guptas are reportedly divesting much of their vast South African holdings, and Zuma now clings to state power by his fingernails, having lost control of the ruling African National Congress leadership to the faction led by Cyril Ramaphosa, the labor leader turned wealthy multinational corporate shareholder.

“The term ‘white monopoly capital’ has been central to the South African political conversation since before Nelson Mandela was imprisoned for treason in 1962.”

The Times claims the Guptas and their p.r. firm set these events in motion by injecting the concept of “white monopoly capital” into the debate, thus poisoning the political dialogue, in the Times’ view. By 2017, Bell Pottinger “stood accused of setting off racial tensions through a furtive campaign built on Twitter bots, hate-filled websites and speeches…pushing a highly toxic narrative, namely that whites in South Africa had seized resources and wealth while they deprived blacks of education and jobs,” reporter David Segal wrote. “The message was popularized with an incendiary phrase, ‘white monopoly capital.’”

According to the Times, “white monopoly capital,” “a phrase that for years had been confined to left-wing academic circles, was suddenly unavoidable.”

That’s utter nonsense. The term “white monopoly capital,” in those precise words or essential meaning, has been central to the South African political conversation since before Nelson Mandela was imprisoned in 1962. The demand for majority control of the nation’s land and major industries was articulated in the anti-apartheid movement’s seminal political document, the Freedom Charter of 1955:

“The national wealth of our country, the heritage of all South Africans, shall be restored to the people;
The mineral wealth beneath the soil, the banks and monopoly industry shall be transferred to the ownership of the people as a whole… .”

It is an indisputably socialist document directly addressing the white capitalist monopoly on power. Although the honchos of the ruling party, the ANC, have betrayed its principles, in practice, at every juncture since the fall of apartheid in the early Nineties, the entirety of South African political leadership is still compelled to give lip service to the Charter and its embedded demands. The Brits that ran Bell Pottinger worked for the Gupta brothers, but their political client was President Jacob Zuma, then leader of the ANC, who needs no spin-doctor or “Twitter bots” to articulate his public position on “white monopoly power.”

“The Freedom Charter is an indisputably socialist document directly addressing the white capitalist monopoly on power.”

“The minority dominates land. That’s why we are saying there is a monopoly. It is not insult,” said Zuma, in an interview with South African television, last year. “It is a fact, it’s not manufactured. We are telling the truth. We fought, they took everything, political power which we now have. They took economical power and land. Let us take the mines, companies who dominate in mines, few are benefiting. You will find the same companies in charge. That means they are dominating. They are monopolizing, they are not black.

“You have companies that are white, they start from big commodities to the broom, they are monopolies, they should be called by what they practice. There is monopoly capital and in South Africa it is white. Because of our history it does have a color and it is white,” Zuma said.

The political crisis in South Africa derives from the failure of Zuma and the leadership of the ANC to actually oust white monopoly capital from the commanding heights of the economy, after nearly a quarter century in nominal power. Instead, they have fatted a new class of Black bourgeoisie, most of them ANC-connected, as junior partners with the white monopolists through the government’s Black Economic Empowerment policies. Most notable among these nouveau Black capitalists is Cyril Ramaphosa, now president of the ANC and near certain to succeed Zuma in the next election, if not much sooner.

“They have fatted a new class of Black bourgeoisie, most of them ANC-connected, as junior partners with the white monopolists.”

Ramaphosa was once leader of the mine workers union, but became one of the richest men in South Africa, with assets estimated at $450 million, thanks to his alliance with the multinational corporate mine owners. Ramaphosa is widely believed to have given the green light for police to massacre 34 striking workers at the Marikana mine operated by the Lonmin conglomerate, of which he was a director, in 2012.

Ramaphosa and a majority of the current members of the ANC’s executive committee now claim that “white monopoly capital” is “no longer part of the party’s lexicon,” although the iissue remains hotly contested and factionalized. Ramaphosa was last year reported to have “criticized the use of the phrase ‘white monopoly capital’ and said it was an invention of a highly paid public relations company to ‘protect their clients’ accused of state capture.”

Thus, the New York Times is running the same line as Ramaphosa, the darling of the multinational corporations that were incensed at having to share access to Zuma’s presidency with the intrusive (and brown) Gupta brothers. Under Ramaphosa, their absolute monopoly on the state’s attentions will no doubt be restored.

Joel Netshitenzhe, a Ramaphosa ally on the ANC national executive committee, said, “the phenomenon of monopoly capital is a global one and manifests itself differently. In that context, it would therefore not be correct to characterize ours simply as white monopoly capital. That relationship would apply whether it’s Japanese, Indian, white or whatever category you can think about," he said.

Apparently, the global system created by white monopolists -- and still dominated by them, in South Africa and around the planet -- loses its essential, racialized character when darker capitalists throw some money in game. Supposedly, the same transformation occurs when one mixes in a gaggle of Black Economic Empowerment program beneficiaries. Voila! Racial capitalism eliminated! Even if nothing changes in the lives of the masses of people.

“Ramaphosa and a majority of the current members of the ANC’s executive committee now claim that “white monopoly capital” is “no longer part of the party’s lexicon.”

The torrential flows of capital out of South Africa and the rest of the continent are the legacy of centuries of colonial and imperial extraction by a system that invented white supremacy to justify its existence. It still exists -- and its impact on Black people on the ground in South Africa remains profoundly racialized.

Zuma’s successors are scrambling to shed their old vocabularies. An exhaustive article by Christopher Malikane, an associate professor of economics, at Wits University, shows that the term “white monopoly capital” was never “confined to left-wing academic circles” in South Africa, but rather was an integral element of political speech among movers and shakers in all three prongs of the Tripartite Alliance that has ruled South Africa since 1994: the ANC, the South African Communist Party, and the labor federation, COSATU. Lowly professors and activists like Malikane were also quite at home with the term, long before the London p.r. firm is said to have “invented” it. Malikane dug up one of his old papers from 2002, and found that it was “replete with the concept "white monopoly capital."

“The term ‘white monopoly capital’ was never ‘confined to left-wing academic circles’ in South Africa.”

He documents the term’s presence in a 2012 joint report of the South African Communist Party and COSATU:

"The two allies resolved to stand shoulder-to-shoulder, together with the ANC, in the struggle to deepen our national democratic revolution, to end the national oppression of the majority, the super-exploitation of workers by white monopoly capitalism and the triple oppression faced by women, in order to create a new non-racial, non-sexist, democratic and prosperous South Africa," it reads.

Further back in time, Malikane finds the offending term in an address by labor federation chief Blade Nzimande, in 1997:

"The call for only organised workers to make sacrifices, without calling for the same from white monopoly capital, is essentially a reactionary call for the maintenance of the super-exploitation of the black working class."

South African Premier Mbhazima Shilowa, speaking to a Black Economic Empowerment strategy lunch in 2006, said:

"As I have indicated in the past, we need to send a clear message that the time for white monopoly capital to pay lip service to economic transformation and empowerment, especially for women, is past and will not be rewarded in Gauteng"

And former COSATU General Secretary Zwelinzima Vavi, at a 2005 Special Congress of the South African Communist Party:

"Economic power is still in the hands of white monopoly capital. The aspirant and vocal black bourgeoisie remains numerically small and depends heavily on the state and white business for its survival."

“The term is in the process of being purged at the behest of capital.”

Clearly, “white monopoly capital” did not fall out of use as a staple term of the South African political class. Rather, the term is in the process of being purged at the behest of multinational (dare we say “white”?) capital.

Fortunately, the leadership of the African National Congress can no longer dictate politics in South Africa. The insurgent Economic Freedom Fighters, which has been building an electoral challenge to the ANC from the left since 2013, has no problem with the term “white monopoly capital.” Neither does Irvin Jim, head of NUMSA, the nation’s largest union. White monopoly capital is real, and reproduces itself:

“The stranglehold of a small number of white monopoly capitalists over the great bulk of our country’s wealth and resources is based on colonial dispossession and promotes racial oppression. This concentration of wealth and power perpetuates the super-exploitation of millions of black workers.”

Back in 2014, predating Bell Pottinger’s contract with President Zuma, Irvin Jim spoke to the historical realities of South Africa:

“Basically you have white monopoly capital, corporate multinationals and the white population who dominate the South African economy. The freedom charter in this case is very clear. It says mineral wealth, the soil, banks and monopoly industries must be transferred to the ownership of the people as a whole. That is the cornerstone for non-racialism and non-sexism. To leave the existing economic conditions intact is basically to allow racial supremacy to continue.”

Which is the deal that President-to-be Cyril Ramaphosa has reaffirmed with his mentors and patrons among the white monopoly capitalists. Perhaps he will make similar arrangements with Japanese and Indian capitalists, as well, as their numbers increase, but that will not alter the raciaized nature of the system as experienced by the South African people.

South Africa is, perhaps, unique, in that it is a non-liberated country whose broad political discourse is saturated with Marxist language. Even the operatives of the oppressor, like Cyril Ramaphosa, who calls himself a “committed socialist,” speak “Marxian.” The term “white monopoly capital” speaks to the reality of South African political economy. It will not be erased from that nation’s vocabulary by order of the next president, or the New York Times.

BAR executive editor Glen Ford can be contacted at [email protected]

South Africa

Do you need and appreciate Black Agenda Report articles. Please click on the DONATE icon, and help us out, if you can.


Related Stories

The Soweto Uprising’s Unfinished Business
Mark P. Fancher
The Soweto Uprising’s Unfinished Business
15 June 2022
Worldwide outrage over the killing of Soweto youth protesting on June 16, 1976 was a turning point in South African history.
MANIFESTO: The 1959 Pan Africanist Manifesto
Editors, The Black Agenda Review
MANIFESTO: The 1959 Pan Africanist Manifesto
26 January 2022
The Pan African Congress of Azania’s 1959 Manifesto provides a radical blueprint for African self-determination.
 F.W. deKlerk: Requiem for a Racist Murderer
Dr. Marsha Coleman-Adebayo, BAR editor and columnist
F.W. de Klerk: Requiem for a Racist Murderer
17 November 2021
F.W. de Klerk was the last apartheid president of South Africa.
Massive General Strike in South Africa Highlights Demand for Radical Policy Changes
Pavan Kulkarni
Massive General Strike in South Africa Highlights Demand for Radical Policy Changes
03 March 2021
Millions of workers took part in the general strike on February 24, according to the South African Federation of Trade Unions which called for the
A Milestone for South African Shack Dwellers Movement
Pan Africanism Today Secretariat
A Milestone for South African Shack Dwellers Movement
14 October 2020
Abahlali baseMjondolo celebrates 15 years of revolutionary struggle for land, housing and dignity.
Blacks From Elsewhere and the Right of Abode
Achille Mbembe 
Blacks From Elsewhere and the Right of Abode
15 January 2020
Sorrowing over the treatment of migrants, Achille Mbembe calls for Africa to adopt a pro-migration stance, phase out colonial borders and become “a
Socialist Revolutionary Workers Party launched in South Africa
Rafael Stedile
Socialist Revolutionary Workers Party launched in South Africa
10 April 2019
Over a thousand gathered in Johannesburg to attend the Launch Congress of the party which seeks to build socialism in South Africa
Socialist Revolutionary Workers’ Party Vows to Resist South African Government’s Privatization Move
by Irvin Jim, NUMSA General Secretary
Socialist Revolutionary Workers’ Party Vows to Resist South African Government’s Privatization Move
06 February 2019
The new party insists that transition to renewable energy must be driven by the working class, not for capitalist profit.
South Africa Suffers Capitalist Crisis Déjà Vu
Patrick Bond
South Africa Suffers Capitalist Crisis Déjà Vu
09 January 2019
The old guard of South Africa’s ruling party put on new clothes last year, and a new party of the working class finally made its debut.
The Land Question: Unpacking Expropriation Without Compensation in South Africa
Nombuso Mathibela
The Land Question: Unpacking Expropriation Without Compensation in South Africa
04 July 2018
“Pay no one for land acquired illegally.”

More Stories


  • Black Agenda Radio July 1, 2022
    Black Agenda Radio with Margaret Kimberley
    Black Agenda Radio July 1, 2022
    01 Jul 2022
    Reproductive justice in the wake of SCOTUS overturning Roe v. Wade, campaign to free Mumia Abu Jamal, and Frederick Douglass speech "What to the Slave is the 4th of July" read by Ossie Davis.
  • Reproductive Justice
    Black Agenda Radio with Margaret Kimberley
    Reproductive Justice
    01 Jul 2022
    We discuss reproductive justice in the wake of the Supreme Court ruling which overturned the Roe v. Wade decision. Loretta Ross is co- author of the book Reproductive Justice, and co-founder of…
  • Campaign to Bring Mumia Home
    Black Agenda Radio with Margaret Kimberley
    Campaign to Bring Mumia Home
    01 Jul 2022
    Gwen Debrow of the Campaign to Free Mumia joins to tell us what we can do to go all out for Mumia during the July 3rd nationwide actions.
  • "What to the Slave is the 4th of July?" read by Ossie Davis
    Black Agenda Radio with Margaret Kimberley
    "What to the Slave is the 4th of July?" read by Ossie Davis
    01 Jul 2022
    On July 5, 1852 Frederick Douglass was asked to speak on the topic of the nation’s independence celebration. Now known as What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?, the speech was a stinging…
  • Democrats Exposed By the End of Roe v. Wade
    Margaret Kimberley, BAR Executive Editor and Senior Columnist
    Democrats Exposed By the End of Roe v. Wade
    29 Jun 2022
    The full extent of Democratic Party treachery was exposed when the Roe v. Wade decision was overturned. Only right wing Americans have any expectation of getting what they want from the electoral…
  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with us
about us
contact us