Black Agenda Report
Black Agenda Report
News, commentary and analysis from the black left.

  • Home
  • Africa
  • African America
  • Education
  • Environment
  • International
  • Media and Culture
  • Political Economy
  • Radio
  • US Politics
  • War and Empire

Puppet Government of Somalia Invites Everybody to Invade
Glen Ford, BAR executive editor
23 Jun 2009
🖨️ Print Article

somaili fightersA Black Agenda Radio Commentary by Glen Ford 

Click the flash player below to listen to or the mic to download an mp3 copy of this BA Radio commentary.

In what should be its last gasp, the regime that claims to govern Somalia, "huddled in a corner of Mogadishu," the capital, has "called on 'Kenya, Ethiopia, Djibouti, Yemen' - anybody! - to save them from what it called 'terrorists.'" The Ethiopians, who installed the mini-state after invading  Somalia with U.S. support in 2006, are already on the move in the country - whose soil they never left. But a larger invasion to beat back Islamist/nationalist fighters can only occur with "active U.S. coordination and logistical support." President Obama may get a war of his own in Africa.

 

 

US-Installed Puppet “Government” of Somalia Invites Everybody to Invade
A Black Agenda Radio commentary by Glen Ford
“The embattled 'government' has abandoned all pretense of defending Somali national sovereignty.”
The so-called government of Somalia, an updated version of the government that was installed by U.S.-supported Ethiopian invaders, is now asking American allies in the region to invade the country, again. After losing all but a small patch of Mogadishu, the capital city, to Islamic nationalist forces, the speaker of the foreign-backed parliament called on “Kenya, Ethiopia, Djibouti, Yemen” – anybody! – to save them from what he called “terrorists.” That’s the same line the United States uses to describe opposition forces – although even the New York Times concedes that the “vast majority” of the fighters are Somali.
Ethiopia, Somalia’s historic adversary in the region, declared it would invade once again if it felt seriously threatened by its neighbor. In fact, Ethiopian troops never fully withdrew from Somalia, but simply disengaged after suffering heavy casualties in their attempt to occupy the country following the 2006 invasion. That war was extremely unpopular at home, and Ethiopia’s military regime would rather not relive the experience.
With its call for yet another foreign invasion, the embattled, rump “government,” reduced to a dwindling domain of a few neighborhoods, has abandoned all pretense of defending Somali national sovereignty. It has surrendered its fate to Washington, the same superpower that instigated Ethiopia to drive out an Islamic Courts government two and a half years ago, depriving southern Somalia of the only period of peace it had known since 1991. By begging its U.S.-backed neighbors to save it from its own people, the quickly disappearing Mogadishu mini-state is inviting a wider regional war that could enflame much of northeast Africa.
“It is a military operation that cannot possibly occur without active U.S. coordination and logistical support.”
Such a calamity would appeal to Susan Rice, the American ambassador to the United Nations and the Obama administration’s most aggressive advocate of the doctrine of “humanitarian” military intervention, sometimes called R2P – the “Responsibility to Protect.” In essence, R2P is a license for the United States and its surrogates to intervene whenever a government cannot, or will not, protect its people from harm, as defined by the United States. In practice, the U.S. creates conditions that endanger masses of people, and then nominates itself to come to the “rescue.”
The U.S.-backed Ethiopian invasion plunged Somalia into what the United Nations called “the worst humanitarian crisis in Africa” – worse than Darfur – with tens of thousands dead and millions displaced. It was a disaster made in the U.S.A., which Washington justified based on the presence in Somalia of persons the Americans claimed were associated with Al Qaida. The rump regime huddled in a corner of Mogadishu now frantically pushes all of Washington’s hot buttons, claiming that Al Qaida is at the gates, and enticing armies from the region to descend on Somalia. It is a military operation that cannot possibly occur without active U.S. coordination and logistical support. Very soon, Barack Obama may have a war in Africa that he can claim as his own. And Susan Rice may have her humanitarian crisis she’s been looking for. For Black Agenda Radio, I’m Glen Ford. On the web, go to www.BlackAgendaReport.com.
BAR executive editor Glen Ford can be contacted at Glen.Ford@BlackAgendaReport.com.
 

 

Do you need and appreciate Black Agenda Report articles? Please click on the DONATE icon, and help us out, if you can.


More Stories


  • Ali Abunimah
    Israel’s “opposition” offers genocide with better PR
    04 Nov 2026
    Israel's election produced no real alternative for Palestinians, because every Zionist party from Eisenkot's Yashar to Golan's Democrats shares the same commitment to apartheid, occupation, and…
  • Abayomi Azikiwe
    Ethiopia Retakes Rebel Stronghold in Tigray While Seeking to Stabilize Security Situation
    04 Nov 2026
    Armed opposition groups have failed to make gains as the capital, Addis Ababa, remains firmly under government control.
  • Orinoco Tribune
    Why Several Latin American Countries Abstained at UN Vote on US Blockade Against Cuba
    04 Nov 2026
    The collapse in support for the UN resolution against the U.S. blockade of Cuba reflects Washington's aggressive diplomatic pressure and blackmail on Latin American governments rather than any…
  • Gary Wilson
    Ebola workers strike in Congo as the United States goes after the mines
    04 Nov 2026
    Washington signed agreements for Congo's copper and cobalt while Ebola spread across 67 health zones and medical workers went unpaid for their hazardous labor.
  • Brad Reed
    ‘Oligarchy Is on the Ballot’: Reports Uncover Unprecedented Sums Ultrarich Spent to Buy 2026 Midterms
    04 Nov 2026
    “In a democracy, it’s supposed to be one person, one vote, and the more one person can influence, the less egalitarian our system becomes,” said one expert.
  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with us
about us
contact us