Black Agenda Report
Black Agenda Report
News, commentary and analysis from the black left.

  • Home
  • Africa
  • African America
  • Education
  • Environment
  • International
  • Media and Culture
  • Political Economy
  • Radio
  • US Politics
  • War and Empire

Troubled White Troops on Ghetto Streets
Glen Ford, BAR executive editor
03 Dec 2008
🖨️ Print Article

Troubled White Troops on Ghetto Streets

A Black Agenda Radio commentary by Glen Ford

Those who want a downloadable MP3 copy can obtain one from our Black Agenda Radio archive page here.

"Troops with a history of counter-insurgency warfare are
not fit to patrol the streets of America, especially Black America."

The U.S. military's plans to assign 20,000 federal troops to cope
with terrorist attacks, domestic disasters and civil unrest, would inevitably
expose Americans to the habits of savagery U.S. soldiers have acquired in Iraq
and Afghanistan. The "civil unrest" mission is the most dangerous aspect of the
plan; in the United States, quashing civil unrest is practically a euphemism
for suppressing Black and other non-white populations. Above and beyond legal
questions over the authority of federal troops within the borders of the United
States, the U.S. military is totally unsuited to the mission - especially
troops that have served in combat units in America's two Asian wars. Yet these
are the very soldiers that will be assigned to keep Black folks under control.

The domestic rapid-reaction force is to be built around
combat units, most of whose troops have served at least one tour of duty in
Iraq or Afghanistan. The military newspaper Stars
and Stripes
reports that "roughly four in 10 soldiers...have served more
than one deployment - and that number is growing." Most soldiers in the U.S.
Army are currently either in Iraq or Afghanistan, have previously been deployed
there, or are about to be deployed. After five years of war in Iraq and six in
Afghanistan, the U.S. military has been largely transformed into a huge
counter-insurgency apparatus. Troops with a history of counter-insurgency warfare,
in which the military makes little distinction between civilians and active
fighters, are not fit to patrol the streets of America, especially Black
America.

"300,000 American
military personnel "are suffering from mental
health problems
, including PTSD."

Today's U.S. military is demographically quite different
than the Vietnam era Army, in which Blacks made up a hugely disproportionate
share of soldiers in combat arms: infantry, armor and artillery. Some elite
units were majority Black. Thirty five years after creation of the
all-volunteer military, these same combat arms units are overwhelming white and
Hispanic. History has shown us that mostly white units should not be deployed
with live firepower in Black neighborhoods. This holds true, even if a Black
man will soon be commander-in-chief.

Racism aside, the current American military is wracked with
post-traumatic stress disorders - PTSD. Waging war in urban areas is bad for
soldiers' mental health. A study by the RAND Corporation found that 300,000
American military personnel "are suffering from mental
health problems
, including PTSD." That's an alarming one out of every five
troops - certainly even higher in combat units. And most soldiers avoid being
diagnosed with PTSD or other mental difficulties, for fear of ruining their
careers.

It is unacceptable that mostly white veterans of an urban,
counter-insurgency war, a significant proportion of whom have mental
difficulties related to violence, would be deployed in the ghettos of America.
This is the definition of armed and dangerous, and a formula for reenactment of
Iraq and Afghanistan experiences on the streets of urban America. The U.S.
military should not be occupying other people's countries. They are the last
folks you should want to see on the streets of our own. For Black Agenda Radio,
I'm Glen Ford.

BAR executive editor Glen Ford can be contacted
at Glen.Ford@BlackAgendaReport.com.

Do you need and appreciate Black Agenda Report articles? Please click on the DONATE icon, and help us out, if you can.


More Stories


  • Sara Flounders , Joe Lombardo
    RESPONSE TO: Lawrence S. Wittner’s “Spinning Illusions: The Anti-American Left and the Ukraine War” – a new McCarthyism
    23 Aug 2023
    Recently articles have appeared on the front page of the New York Times that try to smear Code Pink, The People’s Forum and TriContinental as Chinese agents. The Times article was followed by a…
  • Yes! An NFL Player Can Be Exploited
    Gus Griffin
    Yes! An NFL Player Can Be Exploited
    23 Aug 2023
    Michael Oher’s story of exploitation is even worse than the white savior narrative presented by Hollywood.
  • Case studies: US military assistance in Africa doesn’t work
    Jim Lobe
    Case studies: US Military Assistance in Africa Doesn’t Work
    23 Aug 2023
    ​​​​​​​Authors of a new report worry that Washington won’t heed their warnings but double down in an era of Great Power Competition.
  • How Washington Shapes ICC To Its Own Aims
    Maureen Clare Murphy
    How Washington Shapes ICC To Its Own Aims
    23 Aug 2023
    The International Criminal Court is itself criminal in its selective prosecutions and obedience to Washington's directives. In turn, the U.S. specifically prohibits aid to the Palestinian Authority…
  • Why Is the U.S. Now Favoring Accelerating the Formation of a Force to Intervene in Haiti?
    Narciso Isa Conde
    Why Is the U.S. Now Favoring Accelerating the Formation of a Force to Intervene in Haiti?
    23 Aug 2023
    The impending occupation of Haiti is the latest example of imperialist aggression against that nation and others.
  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with us
about us
contact us