Will Somalia Become Obama's War?
A Black Agenda Radio commentary by Glen Ford
To obtain a downloadable MP3 copy of this Black Agenda Radio visit the BA Radio archive page.
"American targets have
expanded to include the whole of Somali society."
The days of the American-instigated Ethiopian occupation of
Somalia appear to be numbered. Islamic resistance forces reportedly control
most of south and central Somalia, and are within miles of the ruined capital,
Mogadishu. Within Ethiopia, the occupation of its neighbor seems to be very
unpopular, although public opinion is difficult to measure in a dictatorship.
If the military momentum remains with the Somali Islamic "Shabab" forces,
Barack Obama will be unable to avoid a fundamental foreign policy decision
immediately upon assuming office. Will he continue the Bush regime's
aggressions against Somalia, predicated on Washington's claim to a "right" to
invade and brutalize other peoples in search of targets in the so-called "war
on terror."
The American targets have expanded to include the whole of
Somali society since late 2006, when Washington encouraged and materially
supported Ethiopia's invasion. The Bush gang shrieked hysterically that the
Islamic Courts movement, which had risen suddenly to bring a semblance of peace
and stability to much of Somalia, was a kind of front for Osama bin Laden.
The Americans sent arms and money to the Somali warlords
that the Islamic Courts had defeated. This was not so much an American attempt
at regime change, as a cruel conspiracy to plunge Somalia back into the
warlord-induced chaos that had reigned since 1991. When the U.S. discovered
there was no Somali alternative to the Islamists - in a country that is 99
percent Muslim - Washington opted to launch a general war on Somalia with
Ethiopia as its proxy.
"The Americans pursued their own reign of terror, sending
missiles and hit squads to assassinate and kidnap those Washington considered
‘terrorists.'"
The result was a nightmare for the Somali people, millions
of whom have been displaced from their homes. Seven hundred thousand have fled
Mogadishu, the capital, part of what the United Nations called Africa's "worst
humanitarian crisis."
According to a British human rights group, at least 17 U.S.
ships have served as "floating prisons," some of them off the Somali
coast. The Americans, operating out of their garrison in neighboring Djibouti
and from the high seas, pursued their own reign of terror, sending missiles and
hit squads to assassinate and kidnap those Washington considered "terrorists" -
a term that in Somalia came to mean anyone thought to favor creation of an
Islamic state.
It was a nascent Islamic state that had made much of Somalia
fit for human habitation, before the American and Ethiopian invasion. The rump
Somali Transitional Federal Government, a creature of
the Ethiopian occupiers, could not survive if the Ethiopians withdrew, as seems
a likely result of the Somali resistance offensive.
The American war in the Horn of
Africa has included all the covert techniques developed by the Bush regime to
destabilize nations and whole regions of the globe. In Somalia, it seems likely
that the Islamist "Shabab" will prevail in much of the country.
The U.S. will have no friends
among the Shabab. Barack Obama will be forced to decide - if he has not done so
already - whether or not to continue George Bush's war against Somalia. If
Obama's version of the war on terror requires the subjugation and continued
destruction of Somalia, then he will have made that war his own.
For Black Agenda radio, I'm Glen
Ford.
BAR executive editor
Glen Ford can be contacted at Glen.Ford@BlackAgendaReport.com.
Memories of a sovereign Venezuela collide with the reality that it is now a U.S. vassal state.
The crisis of late-stage capitalism has stripped away the liberal disguise and revealed white supremacy as the official ideology of the U.S. state.
“It is perfectly clear that the war of aggression waged by Morocco against the [Western] Saharan people is a purely colonial war.”
The Congressional Black Caucus electoral strategy has turned the 2026 midterm elections into a dumpster dive for corporate interests and Zionist approval.
The Democratic Party's continued support for Israel's genocide is not just a moral and political liability but also an economic one which impacts its voters, yet the party refuses to frame it as such.
