by David DeGraw
Americans were shocked to learn that U.S. Census Bureau figures showed 46 million people in poverty – the most ever. But a better count would have registered and additional ten million poor persons in the U.S. – 56 million. “The Census measures poverty based on costs of living metrics established in 1955 — 56 years ago.” But even skewed figures cannot disguise the fact that “the United States currently has the highest inequality of wealth in our nation’s history.”
Undercount: How Census Bureau Propaganda Ignores the Suffering of 10 Million Impoverished Americans
by David DeGraw
This article previously appeared in AmpedStatus.
“We can estimate that at least 56 million Americans, roughly 18.5% of the population, lived in poverty in 2010.”
Here we go again. The government and corporate media are pumping out more propaganda on vital economic statistics to mask the severity of our economic crisis. Deceptive [3], GDP [4], inflation [5] and poverty [6] measures are easily exposed with some research and a closer look at the data. The latest deception comes from the Census Bureau in their annual poverty report, which is now uncritically being “reported” on throughout the corporate media and echoing throughout online news outlets as well.
The new Census data reveals that a stunning 46.2 million [7] Americans, 15unemployment.1% of the population, lived in poverty in 2010. This is an increase of 2.6 million people since 2009. While these are staggering statistics that represent the highest number of American people to ever live in poverty, and a dramatic year-over-year increase, it significantly undercounts the total.
The Census Bureau poverty rate is a highly flawed measurement that uses outdated methodology. The Census measures poverty based on costs of living metrics established in 1955 — 56 years ago. They ignore many key factors, such as the increased costs of medical care, child care, education, transportation, and many other basic expenses. They also don’t factor geographically-based costs of living. For example, try finding a place to live in New York that costs the same as a place in Florida. A much more accurate measurement of poverty, which factors in these vital cost of living variables, comes from the National Academy of Sciences (NAS). Unlike the Census poverty measure, which gets significant coverage throughout the corporate media, the NAS measurement gets little, if any, mainstream media coverage.
“For every one person the Census counts as being in poverty, using NAS calculations 1.2 people are in poverty.”
To see how the Census Bureau drastically undercounts poverty totals, let’s look at the past few years of data. In 2008, the Census reported that 39.8 million Americans lived in poverty. However, based on NAS calculations, 47.4 million Americans lived in poverty that year. In 2008, the Census undercounted by 7.6 million people. For the year of 2009, the Census reported that 43.6 million Americans lived in poverty. In my analysis [8], extrapolating data from 2008 NAS measurement, I estimated that the number of Americans living in poverty in 2009 was at least 52 million [8]. After making this estimate, the NAS measurement was released, backing up my claim by revealing that 52.8 million [6] Americans lived in poverty. In 2009, the Census undercounted by 9.2 million people.
The 2010 NAS poverty totals are yet to be released, so let’s extrapolate data from the new Census statistics in comparison to past NAS data, in the same way we accurately estimated the NAS 2009 poverty totals, to estimate the total number of Americans living in poverty in 2010:
As a general statistical trend, for every one person the Census counts as being in poverty, using NAS calculations 1.2 people are in poverty. In other words, the trend has been for every 10 people the Census reports as living in poverty, NAS reports there are 12. This would mean that 55.4 million people lived in poverty in 2010.
However, with costs of living sharply increasing [5], the discrepancy between the Census and NAS totals has also been increasing. Over the past two years, for every one additional person the Census counts as falling into poverty, 1.42 people fall into poverty as calculated by NAS methodology. This would mean that 56.5 million people lived in poverty in 2010.
Therefore, after extrapolating the data, we can estimate that at least 56 million Americans, roughly 18.5% of the population, lived in poverty in 2010 according to NAS methodology, approximately 10 million more than the Census Bureau is reporting.
“A family of four trying to live on $22k per year is an extremely low poverty threshold.”
So when you hear the government and media tell you that 46 million Americans lived in poverty in 2010, while that is horrifying enough, you should know that even that shocking statistic is putting a major positive spin on this economic disaster that is still far from over.
Also, keep in mind that the Census defines poverty as an income of $22,314 per year for a family of four. That’s $22,314 per year for four people. Given today’s dramatically increasing costs of living, a family of four trying to live on $22k per year is an extremely low poverty threshold.
To put this all in context, while 56 million Americans, 18.5% of the population, live in poverty, US millionaire households have $46 trillion in wealth [9], yet only one-tenth of one percent of the population makes over $1 million per year [9].
The United States currently has the highest inequality of wealth in our nation’s history. Tens of millions of Americans are stressing out wondering how they are going to keep food on the table and pay their bills, meanwhile the people who caused this crisis [10] are rolling around in trillions of dollars.
The statistics speak for themselves. The Robber Barons have now been displaced as America’s most despotic and depraved ruling class [10].
David DeGraw is the editor of AmpedStatus.com [11]. His long-awaited book, The Road Through 2012 [12], will finally be released on September 28th. He can be emailed at David[@]AmpedStatus.com.
Since Kamala Harris became the Democratic nominee for president, liberals have seen her as the next Shirley Chisholm. In this case, they are correct.
The death of Alberto Fujimori should signal the end of a devastating and tragic era for the Peruvian masses. However, the violence and corruption that were staples of his regime remain…
New York City is a case study of how imperialist violence abroad and state violence domestically are two sides of the same coin. The unfortunate stories of Derrell Mickles and Jordan Neely…
The Black Alliance for Peace stands against the continued attempts to pursue U.N. occupation in Haiti and calls on people of conscience to support the Haitian people in the struggle to achieve true…
The Bandung of the North Conference brought delegates from twenty-nine African and Asian nations, to work collectively toward decolonization. Julia Wright and Jenipher R. Jones delivered these…
