Playing the Race Game in South Carolina

Bill Quigley

23 Jan 2008

🖨️ Print Article

Playing the Race Game in South Carolina

by Kevin Alexander Gray

"Neither Clinton nor Obama is taking on the weighty
substance of our issues."

SCkidsObamaSigns

I hesitantly step into the Hillary Clinton/Barack Obama
family scuffle over South Carolina's black vote. Both candidates are products of the Democratic Leadership Council
(DLC), the conservative wing of the Democratic Party. Clinton is a DLC
star, chair of its American
Dream Initiative touting free markets, balanced budgets and middle-class
know-how, while Obama's political action committee, the Hope Fund, has raised money for
half of the DLC's representatives in the Senate. This is how America
measures progress: the DLC, founded as a vehicle for pro-business Southern
white men, is now the arena advancing a black man and a white woman who talk as
if the more populist Southern white man in the race were invisible.

The "controversy" over Clinton's Martin Luther King comment
("it took a president to make the dream a reality") was, if anything, a set up
to push Obama to talk race, something he has taken pains to avoid beyond the
occasional King quote he tosses into the mix. Talking race in a white media
echo chamber works to Clinton's advantage.
First, it is a subtle nod to subconscious and not so subconscious
racism. Secondly, it gives her the
chance to expound upon the Clintons' fictional race history with blacks.

"Talking race in a white
media echo chamber works to Clinton's advantage."

What Bill knows, Hill knows. And Southern politician Bill Clinton has always played race
politics to perfection. Many have perhaps forgotten about Bill, speaking in the
last pulpit King stood in, telling blacks in 1993 how
disappointed "Dr. King would be [in them] if he were alive today," because
of black on black crime. "Crime" has long been a white politician's code to
signal, "I can stick it to blacks." In
his first presidential race Governor Clinton supported the death penalty at a
time when the country was split almost down the middle on the issue. For good
measure, he made sure to oversee the execution of convicted killer Ricky Ray
Rector, a brain-damaged black man, in the heat of the primaries. Then right in time for the Southern
primaries in 1992 he posed with Georgia Senator Sam Nunn in front of a phalanx
of black inmates in white prison suits at Stone Mountain, Georgia, second home
of the Ku Klux Klan. That picture appeared in newspapers across the South the
day people went to the polls. It was Clinton's way to reassure racists.

Now, I have no expectations of Obama taking up race issues
or attacking policies that have disparate negative racial implications. I have no expectation of him highlighting
his blackness. He isn't running to be
"president of black America" (at least not yet). His message is of the elusive and metaphoric "one America" as
opposed to John Edwards' "two Americas" divided between the "haves and
have-nots." Yet, as Clinton discovered
before she started appealing to women and ripping off some of Edwards'
with-the-people rhetoric, looking ahead and trying to run a general election
campaign in the midst of primary battles can bring problems. For Obama, it has meant ignoring what
should be his natural base - black voters.
That is, until he needed them.

"I have no expectations of Obama taking up race issues or
attacking policies that have disparate negative racial implications."

In politics you start with a base. Yet either the Obama campaign is attempting to reverse the
process, or he doesn't see black voters as his base, or he thinks the majority
of blacks will vote race without courting.
Of course he can't openly appeal to black people to vote for him solely on
race, although several of his supporters on black talk radio have demanded that
blacks do just that. The irony is that
Hillary Clinton is openly appealing to blacks to vote for her solely on Bill.
One of the reasons the battle between Clinton and Obama seems so personal at
times is that Clinton considers black voters her natural base, and Obama the
upstart usurper who didn't wait his turn. It's almost as if, like a
disappointed patrician, she were saying, "After all we've done for you people..."
Meanwhile, neither she nor Obama is taking on the weighty substance of our
issues.

It would be perilous for Obama to respond to "Friend of
Bill" Bob Johnson, founder of BET, on yet another insinuation about his past
drug use. It only keeps the drug-using
(and, implied, dealing) black guy stereotype alive. Johnson's comments were deplorable - especially coming from a
person who made his money on the exploitation of rump shaking and rap music
while simultaneously removing news and public affairs from BET. Moreover, I have been involved in enough
campaigns to know that very few things said during them are unintentional,
especially with smart people. Johnson will now move along, just as Clinton's
New Hampshire chairman did after mentioning Obama and cocaine in the same
breath. There's always someone willing
to fall on his sword for the king or queen, and another one waiting to take his
place.

To Obama's credit he put his past drug use out there
first in an effort to inoculate himself from attack. That's how the game works - tell your own story before your
enemies tell it. It doesn't stop folk
from throwing mud, but it makes the stuff less sticky. Perhaps if Obama spoke more forcefully about
the tens of thousands (or hundreds of thousands?) of nonviolent drug offenders
who were not as fortunate as he, and are now locked up in jail, he might gain a
bit more credibility and support from those who accuse him of being devoid of
substance.

"Black incarceration rates during the Clinton years
surpassed those during Ronald Reagan's eight years."

SCprisonerSilhouette
Obama is fortunate he wasn't busted during Bill Clinton's
years in office. Clinton left behind a larger, darker prison population than
when he took office. Black
incarceration rates during the Clinton years surpassed those during Ronald
Reagan's eight years. That Clinton did nothing about mandatory minimum
sentences was no surprise. That he did nothing to change the sentencing
disparity between crack and powder cocaine that disproportionately affects
African Americans was no surprise. That he successfully stumped for "three
strikes and you're out" in the crime bill, for restrictions on the right
of habeas corpus and expansion of the federal death penalty was no surprise.
When he came into office one in four black men were in the talons of the
criminal justice system in some way; when he left, it was one in three. In many
states ex-felons are denied the right to vote, a factor that had a direct
impact on the 2000 presidential vote in Florida.

Hillary Clinton strikes a pose as the wife of
"America's first black president," even as Bill's policies on due
process, equal protection and equal treatment - in other words, civil rights -
were horrible. One Clinton initiative required citizens, mostly
black, in public housing to surrender their Fourth Amendment, or privacy,
rights. His "one strike and you're out"
policy for public housing residents, under which people convicted of a crime,
along with anyone who lives with them, may be evicted without consideration of
their due process rights is still creating housing problems for the poor. Bill (convicted of perjury) and Hillary
Clinton were not similarly chucked out of their publicly subsidized housing,
aka the White House. If they were poor and trying to get back into their old
place in the projects right now, they might not stand a chance.

That's reality in a country that left people on their
roofs to die. John Edwards used Hurricane Katrina as his entrance ticket to the
2008 campaign, but at a substantive level he, Obama and Clinton seem incapable
of addressing "the right of return" for the 250,000 displaced
residents relocated after the storm. A "right of return" would
require that they have somewhere to live and work upon return. Many of
the displaced were renters before the flood. Many have the kind of credit
rating that disqualifies them for most private housing and some types of
government assistance. New Orleans had the highest poverty/crime rate in
the region before the storm, and many of the now displaced were unemployed.
A significant percentage of the 250,000 have criminal records, or someone in
their immediate family does, thus disqualifying them from public housing under
the one-strike policy even if forces in New Orleans weren't intent on
eliminating public housing. Will Edwards, Obama or Hillary Clinton
support the repeal of the one-strike policy? Will they support waiving or
lowering credit requirements? Will they come out for homesteading
or granting people a home and a clean start?

"Talking up race or even recognizing the racial challenges
of living in America brings more peril to Obama than talking up gender does for
Hillary."

If Obama wanted to go after the Clintons on race, there's
plenty of ammunition out there, like Governor Clinton's refusal to sign a civil
rights bill in Arkansas. Or President Clinton's dumping of his friend Lani Guinier from
consideration for the Justice Department's office of civil rights over her
advocacy of cumulative voting, the next frontier for civil rights, which
would break down voting by race and party. But I am just as sure that if Obama
went after Hillary Clinton to reveal the real record of the period she seems
intent on restoring, he would be savagely attacked for playing the race card by
the very same media that is fawning over him now. The fact is, talking up race
or even recognizing the racial challenges of living in America brings more
peril to Obama than talking up gender does for Hillary. Lately some of Clinton's
black supporters here have taken to whispering to black voters that if Obama
can't bring himself to talk about race in South Carolina, he's not going to
talk about it anywhere else. They're right, but they're also snakes. As Clinton
sniffed the other day on Meet the Press,
"This race is not about gender, and I certainly hope it's not about race!"

Nonetheless, if Obama insists on casting his campaign as a
movement, he has to add some substance to it.
It's not just the "old politics of division" that the Clintons
represent; it's the consequences of the policies that they left behind,
including the demobilization of a lot of progressive black and working class
forces who gave Bill a pass because he said, in many politically masterful
ways, "I feel your pain." Whatever candidate starts defining "change" in terms
of abandoning those policies will get my vote.
Until then the Clinton-Obama race spat is just a family spat that soon
will pass.

Kevin Alexander Gray is a longtime civil rights
activist and journalist, living in South Carolina. He can be contacted at kagamba@bellsouth.net.

Do you need and appreciate Black Agenda Report articles? Please click on the DONATE icon, and help us out, if you can.

More Stories