From ICE courtroom ambushes to sheriffs' execution threats, America's domestic repression now openly wields the tools it honed in overthrowing foreign governments.
"I'm not picky so I'm giving you the options cause I have to take one. If not, I'll take all."
These are the words of an ICE agent speaking to an immigration attorney in San Diego California, outside of a courtroom hearing, from a video that began circulating on Friday. The words were bureaucratic language, publicly stated, and coldly calculated. Days later in Florida, Brevard County Sheriff Wayne Ivey delivered a televised warning to protestors: âIf you throw a brick, a firebomb, or point a gun at one of our deputies, we will be notifying your family where to collect your remains, because we will kill you, graveyard dead.â
These statements reflect a political reality. The tactics the United States has long used to dominate, destabilize, and disappear communities across the Global South are now being turned inward. These are not new strategies. Family separation, legal manipulation, surveillance, and targeted disappearance were perfected through decades of foreign intervention. What is new is their use against communities within the United States is being done openly, encouraged publicly and without consequence.
The courthouse âchoiceâ ICE presents, treating human lives as objects to be selected, is rooted in decades of military and political intervention abroad. U.S.-trained forces in Guatemala used similar language to identify Indigenous civilians for elimination. In Colombia, death squads trained by U.S. contractors made public lists of the next people to âdisappear.â In El Salvador and Honduras, U.S. military advisors encouraged the use of fear as public theater. Threats were made loudly and carried out without consequence. Todayâs threats from U.S. sheriffs echo this tradition word for word.
The dirty legacy of imperial policy is not only visible overseas, it is entrenched in domestic systems of incarceration and migration control. In Colombia, our research with Black women impacted by incarceration documents how systemic exclusion and racialized imprisonment operate in tandem. Afroresistance, through its Network of Black Previously Incarcerated Women, traces these patterns back to hemispheric strategies of racial control, refined through U.S. intervention that are mirrored in U.S. prisons and immigration systems. A methodology that centers lived experience and legal accountability makes clear that these are not policies gone wrong. This is the system functioning exactly as intended.
To many outside the U.S., what is happening now is deeply familiar. As people from the Global South, we understand the condescension it carries, and we recognize the playbook. Public officials issuing death threats. Legal spaces transformed into traps. Families disappeared into underground facilities. Senators dragged from press conferences. Military-grade policing deployed against unarmed civilians. These are scenes the U.S. once condemned while financing them elsewhere. Now they are scenes from âhomeâ. This the successful transfer of imperial governance into the domestic sphere.
The infrastructure of violence has always been transferable. The ICE video is not just a record of cruelty. It is a mirror. A bureaucracy that talks about human lives in terms of âoptionsâ and âunitsâ is operating on the same logic that drove wartime atrocities. The sheriffâs casual cruelty is not shocking when seen in the context of policy. It is a policy.
When law enforcement can threaten protesters with execution and face no consequence, it signals the erosion of democratic norms and the normalization of authoritarian tactics.
The transformation of immigration courts into ambush zones deepens this collapse. Legal forums, once viewed as spaces of protection, are now weaponized. ICE agents park themselves outside courtrooms, and families, fearing arrest, refuse to appear. Lawyers are forced into impossible ethical dilemmas, asked to betray one client to protect another. This is deliberate. It is a strategy designed to fracture solidarity and weaken resistance.
We have seen this before. In Latin America, regimes trained and backed by the U.S. consistently targeted lawyers and organizers who supported marginalized communities. The aim was to sever networks of protection and make people easier to control. That is now happening here.
Today, immigration attorneys face the same moral crises as human rights defenders under US backed regimes. How do you protect clients when representation itself makes them vulnerable? What does it mean to practice law when the law has been weaponized?
And yet, resistance grows. The same organizing traditions that have powered liberation across the world are alive in the U.S. In movement spaces led by Black women. In networks that uplift the previously incarcerated. In communities defending language justice and bodily autonomy.
What we are facing is not new and we are not without power. The same systems that taught domination also made us engineers on how to resist it.
The choice before us is stark and urgent. Dismantle the machinery of imperial violence or allow it to become the national norm.
Janvieve Williams Comrie, is a sociologist, a human rights strategist and a movement facilitator. She is the founder and current Executive Director of the international organization AfroResistance. A sought after consultant, speaker and certified personal coach, Janvieve has strategized, advised and worked with a myriad of people all over the world, including heads of states. www.janvieve.com.
Before Colombiaâs national uprising exploded in April 2021, struggles for justice in a majority Black port city set in motion a historic new wave of social protest.
It is best to be wary when American politicians create expressions like "shining city on a hill." One of Reagan's signature phrases has been reused time and again by republicans and democrats a
Surveillance is an integral part of policing in this country.
The events of January 6, 2021 at the Capitol have been discussed and written about endlessly, but without much useful analysis.
Electoral politics in this country is a cover for oligarchic rule. Democratic party victories provide very little material benefit for the people they depend upon for support.
