Black Agenda Report
Black Agenda Report
News, commentary and analysis from the black left.

  • Home
  • Africa
  • African America
  • Education
  • Environment
  • International
  • Media and Culture
  • Political Economy
  • Radio
  • US Politics
  • War and Empire

A Less ‘White’ USA – But What Political Direction?
23 May 2007
🖨️ Print Article

by BAR executive editor Glen Ford

While the white majority slept, one night last year the U.S. "minority" population reached 100 million - roughly one-third of the nation and steadily growing. TheMinorityUSAeastLA demographic trend cannot be halted by even the most stringent border controls; almost half of the under-five U.S. population is already Hispanic, Black or Asian. But African Americans, who reached the 40 million mark last year, face a particular challenge: How to forge practical working relationships with other "minorities" so that they will choose progressive political action rather than collaboration with the "worst elements of the dwindling white Anglo population."

A Less ‘White' USA - But What Political Direction?

by BAR executive editor Glen Ford

"It is in Black people's interest that immigrant workers be secure in the employment they obtain in this country."

MinorityUSANoRacismDemoSometime last year, the "minority" population of the United States reached the 100 million mark, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. That means only two-thirds of Americans are whites of non-Hispanic background. In four states - Hawaii, New Mexico, California and Texas - non-Hispanic whites are a minority. The relentless march towards a less and less white United States would continue, even if U.S. borders could be hermetically sealed, because the younger the age of the demographic cohort, the less white they are. Nearly half the nation's children under the age of five, are Hispanic, Black or Asian.

Also in 2006, the Black American population officially reached 40 million. Because of consistent undercounting of African Americans, we can assume that the real figure is considerably more than 40 million. The Black population isn't growing as fast as Hispanics and Asians, but white "Anglos" are hardly increasing their numbers at all. The racial handwriting is on the wall.

The question for African Americans, and in a larger sense, for all progressives, is: What will be the political composition and behavior of this "new" United States in the making. It is an historical FACT that Blacks are the most politically progressive American group, by far. African Americans are a distinct ethnicity with a shared history and culture, a myriad of institutions stretching back many generations on U.S. soil. Blacks share reference points that connect - and give cohesiveness to - a unique, essentially progressive African American worldview. And it is Blacks who are the "Other" pole in the long-prevailing Black-white American dichotomy. For that reason, most of us, until recently, have known where we stood in the American scheme of things, and have opted overwhelmingly on the side of social change.

"It is largely up to Blacks, by our actions, to determine if other ‘minorities' will become progressive partners."

But "Asians" are not an ethnicity - they are grouped together for Census purposes by the region of the globe from which they migrated. Hispanics are not an ethnicity, either, but a language group, an umbrella for populations from many nations and cultures. The challenge to African Americans is to do everything possible to create the political conditions that encourage practical bonds of solidarity in action between Blacks and the growing, but extremely differentiated non-Black "minorities." It is largely up to us, by our actions, to determine if they will become progressive partners, or will take what may seem to be an easier route, by collaborating with the worst elements of the dwindling white Anglo population.

In the critical arena of jobs, it is in Black people's interest that immigrant workers be secure in the employment they obtain in this country - secure enough that they will organize to raise their standards of living, rather than bring down standards of labor for everyone. Blacks must take leadership in this common struggle for workplace justice and living wages. Because, in the fullness of time, the immigrants WILL organize; the only question is, Will they organize with us, or against us.

For Black Agenda Radio, I'm Glen Ford.

Glen Ford can be contacted at Glen.Ford (at) BlackAgendaReport.com.


More Stories


  • BAR Radio Logo
    Black Agenda Radio with Margaret Kimberley
    Black Agenda Radio July 17, 2026
    17 Jul 2026
    In this week’s segment, we discuss the Supreme Court ruling that ends Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haitian immigrants. But we begin with South Africa and discuss the origins of xenophobic…
  • South Africa
    Black Agenda Radio with Margaret Kimberley
    The Anti-Immigration Movement in South Africa
    17 Jul 2026
    What is behind this South African movement that drives immigrants out of the country? We are joined by Nairobi-based political writer and strategist Clinton Nzala, who provides analysis on the…
  • Haitian flags
    Black Agenda Radio with Margaret Kimberley
    Trump Administration Ends TPS for Haitians
    17 Jul 2026
    On June 25, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haitians and Syrians would end. What does this ruling mean for the more than 350,000 Haitians living…
  • Margaret Kimberley, BAR Executive Editor and Senior Columnist
    Lindsey Graham Was the Face of the Duopoly
    15 Jul 2026
    The late Senator Lindsey Graham played the role of chief congressional warmonger very well. But many of his colleagues, who spoke in quieter voices, were completely aligned with his support of U.S.…
  • ​​​​​​​ Ajamu Baraka, BAR editor and columnist , Margaret Kimberley, BAR Executive Editor and Senior Columnist
    The White Supremacist Imperative on Violence: A Black Radical Perspective on the U.S./EU/NATO Axis of Domination
    15 Jul 2026
    The U.S.-EU-NATO axis remains intact, and its commitment to militarism represents an existential threat to the world.
  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with us
about us
contact us