Time to question nonviolent direct action as the path to change
Activism. Democracy. Change through nonviolent direct action. These, Doug Henwood points out, have been fetishes for much of the US left for quite some time, especially that portion of the US left that takes its marching orders from corporate funders. Gene Sharp, the founder of the Albert Einstein Institute who passed away at the end of January was regarded as the father of American nonviolent direction.
I usually write a weekly piece for Black Agenda Report, but this time Iām going to use that space to republish somebody elseās work, easily the most important thing Iāve heard so far this month. Itās an hour long Doug Henwood interview for the weekly radio show Behind The News on KPFA radio. Doug talks with Marcie Smith, who is writing a book on Sharpās long and problematic career in the service of the US national security apparatus. Smith is an adjunct econ professor at John Jay College. She reveals how Gene Sharp and the Albert Einstein Institute which he founded weaponized and deployed nonviolent direct action in the service of successful and unsuccessful US attempts to overthrow the governments of the Soviet Union, Ukraine, China, Myannmar, Iran, Egypt during the Arab Spring, Venezuela, the former Yugoslavia and the Baltic States.
Besides deploying nonviolent direct action to topple governments standing in the way of Uncle Samās global empire, Gene Sharp and his funders have mentored a good deal of what some regard as the US left ā at least those parts of it under the influence of one-percenter philanthropy ā in the tactics and what passes for the philosophy of nonviolent direct action. According to Sharpās and the Albert Einstein Instituteās peculiar philosophy, property destruction is violence, while the ravages of poverty and deprivation, of economic blockades and lack of medical care just to name a few phenomena, are not. Sharpās views on the methods and importance of nonviolent direct action are highly influential in such quarters as Moral Monday and the so-called New Poor Peoples Campaign, parts of the environmental movement, and other places. Whether or not we embrace or espouse nonviolent direct action as an occasional tactic or a bedrock and fundamental strategy we owe it to ourselves to understand the origin of this idea, why the national security state promotes it, how and for whom it works and does not work, and why.
Itās time to critically interrogate the fetishes of nonviolence and nonviolent direct action as a path to the world we need to build. This great interview is a good start to that conversation. Here is the link. Click to listen or download it.
http://shout.lbo-talk.org/lbo/RadioArchive/2018/18_02_22.mp3
You can find Doug Henwoodās Behind the News shows archived for the last several years at http://leftbusinessobserver.com.
Peru's congress has perfected the art of the constitutional coup, disposing of presidents the moment their usefulness expires. The removal of Dina Boluarte continues a decades-long strategy toā¦
When established institutions refuse to respond in the face of genocide, the mandate for justice falls to the people. This tribunal is a global grassroots movement taking the international law intoā¦
We condemn U.S. lawlessness in Our Americas and call for multinational intervention to guarantee a āZone of Peaceā.
Trump Administration officials have frequently invoked the Monroe Doctrine, explaining the aggression toward Latin America.
The liberation of Palestine is, above all, a world-building project.
