Click the flash player above to hear this Black Agenda Radio commentary, or click here to download an mp3 copy.
A Black Agenda Radio Commentary by Glen Ford
"Much of Holder's remarks were not so much about cowardice - the fear of speaking honestly on racial questions - but an abysmal ignorance. To the extent that Black people are omitted or marginalized in the teaching of American history, American history makes no sense."
"It was vitally necessary that the nation's top lawyer use the occasion of Black History Month to shake up the department."
Eric Holder, the U.S. Attorney General, has said the first thing to come out of the Obama Administration that was refreshingly honest and absolutely necessary to the proper exercise of his duties. In a well thought out speech to the U.S. Justice Department commemorating Black History Month, Holder launched a strong critique on the bizarre nature of race relations in the United States. His remarks were clearly
Much of Holder's remarks were not so much about cowardice - the fear of speaking honestly on racial questions - but an abysmal ignorance. To the extent that Black people are omitted or marginalized in the teaching of American history, American history makes no sense. As Holder pointed out, "the study of black history is essential because the history of black America and the history of this nation are inextricably tied to each other.... For example," said the Attorney General, "the history of the United States in the 19th century revolves around a resolution of the question of how America was going to deal with its black inhabitants." To which I will add: if you don't understand that, you know nothing of your country.
"The Bush gang turned the agency into a den of corruption and criminality where no ‘justice' could be found, and the term ‘civil rights' was an epithet."
It's been only a month since a gaggle of know-nothing, arrogantly racist and essentially cowardly white men ran the Justice Department. In the space of eight years, they turned the agency into a den of corruption and criminality where no "justice" could be found, and the term "civil rights" was an epithet. By the time the Bush men were through, "virtually all" of the career lawyers that were hired were right-wing ideologues opposed to the very concept of affirmative action, or the mere idea of "diversity." The Justice Department - and especially its Civil Rights Division - had been largely transformed into a racist club.
For this reason, it was vitally necessary that the nation's top lawyer use the occasion of Black History Month to shake up the department, and let the rest of us know that it's a new day, that George Bush and his Ku Klux klavern are really gone - something that is not so evident in the rest of the Obama Administration, for example, at the Defense Department.
Holder reminded his employees that, "outside the workplace...there is almost no significant interaction" among the races, a situation that does not "differ significantly from the country that existed some 50 years ago." Holder juxtaposed the myth of the "ethnic melting pot" with the reality of racial cowardice. Although Holder didn't mention it, even the term "melting pot" as most Americans use it, is based on an incomplete quotation. The term originally came into vogue on the popularity of a 1908 play called "The Melting Pot ." But the actual words in the play were, "America is God's Crucible, the great Melting-Pot where all the races of Europe are melting and reforming." That is, America was a diversity of white people, only.
And if you don't know that, you don't know white America and its history.
For Black Agenda Radio, I'm Glen Ford.
BAR executive editor Glen Ford can be contacted at
Glen.Ford@BlackAgendaReport.com
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
.
The U.S. has been temporarily rattled in its regime change effort against Iran. Iranian resistance, hubris on the part of the U.S., and Donald Trump’s personal instability combined to undo a twisted…
A conversation focusing on U.S. actions against Iran explains why the imperialist drive for domination will actually lead to a superpower becoming much less powerful.
“...it is like a knee-jerk reaction in the U.S – this consistent, insistent and persistent anti-Caribbean policy in the U.S. from 1776 to the present.”
Most of the world would be at greater ease if Iran had a nuclear bomb.
The ceasefire brings a sense of relief but not safety. Iran showed that the empire is not invincible, but the US commitment to the doctrine of hegemony has not changed.
