Black Agenda Report
Black Agenda Report
News, commentary and analysis from the black left.

  • Home
  • Africa
  • African America
  • Education
  • Environment
  • International
  • Media and Culture
  • Political Economy
  • Radio
  • US Politics
  • War and Empire

Give Everyone Healthcare By Shutting Down Insurance Companies
Bill Quigley
06 May 2009
🖨️ Print Article

by David Swanson
The only way to get something that remotely resembles single payer health care is to demand…single payer health care. Progressives that supported single payer now set their sites lower because President Obama isn’t going there. But “opening a political negotiation by asking for what the other side is offering is no negotiation at all.” Obama offers many explanations for backing away from the health care approach he once claimed to favor. But the real explanation “is the financial influence in Congress and the White House of the insurance industry.” 

Give Everyone Healthcare By Shutting Down Insurance Companies

by David Swanson

This article originally appeared on AfterDowningStreet.org.
”Medicare is much more efficient than insurance companies.”
Our nation has more money than any other, more weapons than all the others combined, and a majority of its citizens believing it is, in some undefined sense, superior.  But the people who live in the United States trail many other nations in basic measures of health and well-being.  Almost uniquely among wealthy nations, we leave tens of millions of our citizens without health coverage, and many times that number with insufficient -- albeit expensive -- health insurance.  We pay more per capita than anybody else for healthcare, and we get dramatically less for it.  What gives?
While there is great variation among the systems used in other wealthy nations, and while their citizens have complaints as well, there is a feature that everybody else has found effective that we uniquely lack, and nowhere is there a nation whose people would willingly part with that feature in exchange for a system like ours.  That feature is called single-payer.  In a single-payer system, such as Canada's, a nation can have private healthcare, private doctors, private hospitals, and greater choice for patients than what we have.  In such a system, no insurance company can tell you which doctors to see, or tell doctors which patients to treat.  Nor are there different prices and procedures depending on what class of patient you are, whether you have insurance through your job or privately, etc.  In such a system, you can go to whatever doctors you want, bring no bill home, and spend zero minutes per year dealing with insurance companies.  In such a system, health insurance companies, at least as we now know them, cease to exist.
“Few things are more despised than health insurance companies.”
But won't that cost more?  And who will pay for it?  Actually, it will mean tremendous savings, because all of the endless paperwork, bureaucracy, advertising, and pointless expenses of the insurance companies will be gone. Medicare is much more efficient than insurance companies, and what we are describing is essentially the expansion of Medicare to cover everyone and everything.  This could be paid for, by the government (the single payer), with an employment tax that would cost most businesses significantly less than they now pay to health insurance companies.  In fact, this shift would take an enormous burden off American businesses that businesses abroad do not carry.  And, according to a study produced by the California Nurses Association, single-payer would provide a net gain of 2.6 million jobs.  It would stimulate the economy significantly better than getting Wall Street banksters those second and third yachts.
single payerWhen he served in the Illinois state legislature, Barack Obama favored single-payer.  He now says that it would be the best solution if he could start from scratch.  The claim that he and others make is that we cannot start from scratch, that change is too difficult, that Americans are in fact reluctant to part with their dear beloved and familiar HMOs.  But this picture is wildly divergent from the real world, in which Medicare was implemented very rapidly and in which few things are more despised than health insurance companies.  The explanation, I'm afraid, is the financial influence in Congress and the White House of the insurance industry.  When you add to this the desire of most Congress members to simply obey either the president or the Republican leader, rather than acting independently, reform becomes very difficult.
“Single-payer would provide a net gain of 2.6 million jobs.”
We are likely to see a dramatic change in healthcare policy this year, but probably at best it will include a limited expansion of Medicare or the creation of a limited public option alongside tweaks to the private, for-profit system still dominated by businesses that make money by avoiding providing healthcare.  At worst, we'll see something called a "public option" that will actually amount to requiring people to purchase private health insurance, a solution already implemented with horrible results in Massachusetts.  The White House recently even proposed privatizing health coverage for veterans, giving the insurance companies profits out of the Veterans' Administration at the expense of the provision of care.  That proposal went over like a brick and was immediately withdrawn, but that is the force we are up against.
We do, however, have a tool with which to go up against it.  A bill in the U.S. House of Representatives, HR 676, is sponsored by Congressman John Conyers and 75 other congress members.  Last year it had 93 cosponsors, and I expect it will soon have more than that in this congress.  The chances of passing the bill this year are slim, but its value in compelling a compromise that includes a partial solution is critical.
”The White House recently proposed privatizing health coverage for veterans.”
Your congress member may be like mine here in Virginia's Fifth Congressional District, Congressman Tom Perriello.  He has not taken a position, and has frequently expressed his belief on this and other issues that the president will be the decider.  Of course he's right that, to a great extent, we now have a monarchical rather than a legislative government.  But we don't have to accept it.  The people of this district, like yours, are not well represented by someone who informs us of what the president is doing.  A journalist could do that.  We are only truly represented if our congress member pushes for what we want, in hopes that the ultimate compromise will be moved somewhat in the direction of what we want.  Opening a political negotiation by asking for what the other side is offering is no negotiation at all.  And failing to support a necessary proven solution to our healthcare crisis that also creates 2.6 million jobs would be an outrage.
David Swanson is the author of the upcoming book "Daybreak: Undoing the Imperial Presidency and Forming a More Perfect Union" by Seven Stories Press.  You can pre-order it for a discount price at http://tinyurl.com/daybreakbook

 

Do you need and appreciate Black Agenda Report articles? Please click on the DONATE icon, and help us out, if you can.


More Stories


  • Uganda LGBTQ Law Obscures Crimes Committed on Behalf of the U.S.
    Margaret Kimberley, BAR Executive Editor and Senior Columnist
    Uganda LGBTQ Law Obscures Crimes Committed on Behalf of the U.S.
    29 Mar 2023
    Uganda's anti-LGBTQ legislation has elicited worldwide condemnation. But that nation's history of invading, pillaging, and killing in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, with U.S. blessings, is…
  • 2023 Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza Democracy and Peace Prize Awarded to John Williams Ntwali and Kambale Musavuli
    Ann Garrison, BAR Contributing Editor
    2023 Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza Democracy and Peace Prize Awarded to John Williams Ntwali and Kambale Musavuli
    29 Mar 2023
    The Victoire Ingabere Umuhoza Prize for Democracy and Peace is awarded to people who work for democracy, peace, and freedom in the Great Lakes Region of Africa.
  • Saturday Mornings
    Raymond Nat Turner, BAR poet-in-residence
    Saturday Mornings
    29 Mar 2023
                                                           …
  •  BAR Book Forum: Hugo ka Canham’s Book, “Riotous Deathscapes”
    Roberto Sirvent, BAR Book Forum Editor
    BAR Book Forum: Hugo ka Canham’s Book, “Riotous Deathscapes”
    29 Mar 2023
    This week’s featured author is Hugo ka Canham. Canham is Associate Professor of Psychology at the University of South Africa and coeditor of Black Academic Voices: The South African Experience. His…
  • “Muerte o Tierra”:  Rosalino Flores’s Death and Comuneros Win Land Struggle, Remain Vigilant
    Clau O'Brien Moscoso
    “Muerte o Tierra”: Rosalino Flores’s Death and Comuneros Win Land Struggle, Remain Vigilant
    29 Mar 2023
    Rosalino Flores is just one of the Peruvians who died in the struggle against the coup government. Clau O'Brien Moscoso continues her dispatches from Peru. A Spanish translation follows.
  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with us
about us
contact us