Black Agenda Report
Black Agenda Report
News, commentary and analysis from the black left.

  • Home
  • Africa
  • African America
  • Education
  • Environment
  • International
  • Media and Culture
  • Political Economy
  • Radio
  • US Politics
  • War and Empire
  • omnibus

Freedom Rider: In Praise of Republicans
Margaret Kimberley, BAR editor and senior columnist
10 Nov 2010
🖨️ Print Article

by BAR editor and senior columnist Margaret Kimberley

If the Republicans are so dumb, why are they winning? Clearly, the “know-thing” party understands some things a lot better than the Democrats – including the actual workings of race and racism in America. Meanwhile, the Democrats seem incapable of self-help. “Just one legislative triumph for working people would have been enough to give Democrats a margin for victory.”

 

Freedom Rider: In Praise of Republicans

by BAR editor and senior columnist Margaret Kimberley

“Republican racism is not at all subtle.”

It is difficult to think of anything good to say about the Republican Party. During the civil rights movement the Republicans made themselves the white people’s party, acting in direct opposition to any and all civil rights legislation. The southern “Dixiecrat” Democrats eventually all became Republicans and solidified that party’s appeal to white America.

Republicans in Florida stole the 2000 election for George W. Bush, who received fewer popular votes than his rival Al Gore. They were able to achieve this feat by preventing eligible Democrat voters in that state, mostly black, from casting their ballots. Republican racism is not at all subtle, and now the demonization of immigrants and Muslims is used to energize that party’s base of support. Moderate Republicans have long been silenced and know that they must be anti-abortion, anti-immigrant and anti-affirmative action if they are to have any political success.

Yet for all their open appeals to racism, and blatant calls for American violence around the globe, the Republicans are clearly the smarter of the two major parties in this country. Beginning in 2006 it became clear that their brand was damaged and a Democratic victory in 2008 looked certain. Barack Obama did win and brought with him majorities in both the House and Senate.

“Republicans operate on the premise that relentless attack will eventually weaken their opponents and they have been proven right with this strategy time and again.”

But the Republicans never accepted their defeat. They operate on the premise that relentless attack will eventually weaken their opponents and they have been proven right with this strategy time and again. Republicans make it clear that Democratic presidential victories mean nothing. Not one Republican supported Bill Clinton’s deficit reduction plan. They defeated Democrats in the 1994 congressional elections and forced Clinton to govern by veto and acquiescence. Years later, not one Republican supported Obama’s health care plan, and even some congressional Democrats saw the handwriting on the wall and voted no as well.

Before Obama ran for the presidency, he claimed to want single payer health coverage, Medicare for all. As he famously said, “Everybody in, nobody out.“ Those words were forgotten on the campaign trail and as president he made sure that single payer was off the table. Big pharma had a seat at that same table in congressional and White House negotiations, but advocates for single payer were literally not allowed into the decision making process. Physicians were actually arrested at a Senate Finance Committee hearing when they protested the exclusion of single payer experts.

While the Obama administration spent a year bailing out the insurance industry and making deals with the big pharma, Republicans were hard at work discrediting the plan. The end result didn’t address the problems of the uninsured and underinsured, and as nature truly abhors a vacuum, Republican obstruction ruled the day.

“Obama and the Democrats weren’t willing to fight back.”

It didn’t matter to Republicans that they really had no ideological reason to oppose the Obama plan. Rush Limbaugh may have been unique in openly saying that he wanted Obama to fail, but the rest of his party was in lockstep. They mobilized their base to confront members of Congress in town hall meetings, made up lies about “death panels,” created the catchy phrase Obamacare and used the Democrats’ timidity to make their case.

While Republicans never let up in opposing anything Obama advocated, Obama and the Democrats weren’t willing to fight back. Democrats have their greatest political success when they speak to voters concerns about their very survival. The collapse of the housing market, unemployment, and foreclosures are all uppermost in the minds of Americans, but the Obama administration was too busy preening about modest successes and invoking the dreaded specter of Tea Party triumph. The Tea Party, a well marketed phrase for the Republican right wing, made political demands on the Republicans and emerged victorious in primaries across the country.

“Obama and his staffers relentless belittled or ridiculed anyone who criticized them.”

Just one legislative triumph for working people would have been enough to give Democrats a margin for victory. Instead Obama and his staffers relentless belittled or ridiculed anyone who criticized them. Press secretary Robert Gibbs said that Obama critics should be “drug tested.“ They missed opportunities to engage their base, while the Republicans used the “ground zero mosque” and fears of Mexican “anchor babies” to keep their based engaged in any issue which might be identified as a republican talking point.

On Election Day, the Democrats barely held on to the Senate and lost control of the House of Representatives. Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell made it clear that defeating Barack Obama in 2012 is his main goal. The Republicans disciplined message emerged triumphant, and they will now be able to not only insult Obama but obstruct his every move if they wish. If the Republicans are stupid, and the Democrats are smart, then we should all wish for a good dose of stupidity.

Margaret Kimberley's Freedom Rider column appears weekly in BAR, and is widely reprinted elsewhere. She maintains a frequently updated blog as well as at http://freedomrider.blogspot.com. Ms. Kimberley lives in New York City, and can be reached via e-Mail at Margaret.Kimberley(at)BlackAgandaReport.com.

Do you need and appreciate Black Agenda Report articles? Please click on the DONATE icon, and help us out, if you can.


More Stories


  • Book: The Rebirth of the African Phoenix
    Black Agenda Radio with Margaret Kimberley
    The Rebirth of the African Phoenix: A View from Babylon
    09 May 2025
    Roger McKenzie is the international editor of the UK-based Morning Star, the only English-language socialist daily newspaper in the world. He joins us from Oxford to discuss his new book, “The…
  • ww2
    Black Agenda Radio with Margaret Kimberley
    Bruce Dixon: US Fake History of World War II Underlies Permanent Bipartisan Hostility Toward Russia
    09 May 2025
    The late Bruce Dixon was a co-founder and managing editor of Black Agenda Report. In 2018, he provided this commentary entitled, "US Fake History of World War II Underlies Permanent Bipartisan…
  • Nakba
    Black Agenda Radio with Margaret Kimberley
    The Meaning of Nakba Day
    09 May 2025
    Nadiah Alyafai is a member of the US Palestinian Community Network chapter in Chicago and she joins us to discuss why the public must be aware of the Nakba and the continuity of Palestinian…
  • Margaret Kimberley, BAR Executive Editor and Senior Columnist
    Ryan Coogler, Shedeur Sanders, Karmelo Anthony, and Rodney Hinton, Jr
    07 May 2025
    Black people who are among the rich and famous garner praise and love, and so do those who are in distress. But concerns for the masses of people and their struggles are often missing.
  • Editors, The Black Agenda Review
    LETTER: Thank you, Mr. Howe, Ama Ata Aidoo, 1967
    07 May 2025
    Ama Ata Aidoo lands a knock-out blow to white neocolonial anti-African revisionism.
  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with us
about us
contact us