Court Finds Deliberate Discrimination by NYC Fire Dept and Mayor | Black Agenda Report

Court Finds Deliberate Discrimination by NYC Fire Dept and Mayor

Glen Ford, BAR executive editor

20 Jan 2010

🖨️ Print Article

A Black Agenda Radio commentary by Glen Ford

The civil rights movement may be moribund, but civil rights law still yields results. New York City, behaving like many of its citizens in claiming that it should not be found guilty of discrimination unless it can be proved that it intended to discriminate, loses the argument in federal court. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act lives.

Purposeful Discrimination in NYC Fire Department Hiring

A Black Agenda Radio commentary by Glen Ford

“The city knew the test was discriminatory, and failed to do anything about it.”

Guilty as charged. A federal judge last week ruled that New York City not only discriminated against Blacks attempting to join the Fire Department, but did so intentionally. According to longtime observers, that’s the first time in memory that New York City has been found guilty of intentional discrimination. Establishing guilt by a “pattern-and-practice” of deliberate discrimination is difficult, since it involves more than simply showing that discrimination occurred. It requires the defendant be shown to have known he was discriminating. The Center for Constitutional Law convinced the judge that, not only did the Fire Department's tests have a discriminatory effect on Black applicants, but that the city knew the test was discriminatory, and failed to do anything about it from 1999 to 2002.

Mayor Michael Bloomberg was also named in the suit, along with the former fire commissioner. But both of them got off on a technicality. Although the judge believed there was “strong evidence” that the mayor and the commissioner had both been informed that the examinations were discriminatory, they were nevertheless entitled to “qualified immunity.” In a deposition, Mayor Bloomberg testified that he “did not recall” receiving a report spelling out the discriminatory impact of the firefighters' test.

“The test is similar to others used in big cities across the nation, with the same intent – to maintain the racial status quo.”

So, why was the test so difficult for Black applicants to pass? Many of the multiple choice questions involved arcane details on firefighting that only people that grew up around firefighters would know – a test put together by people in the overwhelmingly white firefighting culture who wanted to keep outsiders – out. The test is similar to others used in big cities across the nation, with the same intent – to maintain the racial status quo. The examination did not test whether an applicant would be a good firefighter. Instead, it tested whether an applicant was immersed in the trivia of firefighting culture. No wonder a bunch of Irish guys pass the test every year, and no wonder only 3.4 percent of the department is Black, in a city that is one quarter African American.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act holds that, if disproportionate numbers of Blacks and Hispanics fail a test, then it must be shown that the test actually measures the skills and knowledge necessary to do the job.

The suit was brought by three people who took the test, and by the Vulcan Society, an organization of Black firefighters. But the total pool of potential plaintiffs includes every applicant that failed to become a firefighter because of the test, and that could reach into the hundreds. The judge has not yet decided what the remedy should be, but civil rights lawyers say he could order that the city change its hiring policies, and that people who failed to get jobs because of the test be paid the salaries they lost.

New York City plans to appeal the judges ruling, claiming that, even if the test did have a discriminatory impact on Blacks, the city didn't intend for that to happen.

For Black Agenda Radio, I'm Glen Ford. On the web, go to www.BlackAgendaReport.com.

BAR executive editor Glen Ford can be contacted at Glen.Ford@BlackAgendaReport.com.

Do you need and appreciate Black Agenda Report articles? Please click on the DONATE icon, and help us out, if you can.

More Stories

Black Agenda Radio , Black Agenda Radio with Margaret Kimberley
Mumia Abu Jamal Continues His Fight for Freedom
06 Jan 2023
Johanna Fernandez is an Associate Professor of history at Baruch College, and a longtime advocate for political prisoner Mumia Abu Jamal. She joins us from New York City to discuss the loss of his…
Black Agenda Radio , Black Agenda Radio with Margaret Kimberley
UN Permanent Forum on People of African Descent and the Durban Declaration Program of Action
06 Jan 2023
Efia Nwangaza discusses her participation in the first session of the UN Permanent Forum on People of African Descent, a mechanism that emerged from the 2001 Durban world conference against racism.
Black Agenda Radio , Black Agenda Radio with Margaret Kimberley
Sanctions: A Wrecking Ball in a Global Economy
06 Jan 2023
Sara Flounders joins us to discuss her work as editor of the newly published anthology, 'Sanctions: A Wrecking Ball in a Global Economy.' The book is an analysis of U.S. unilateral coercive measures…
Margaret Kimberley, BAR Executive Editor and Senior Columnist
White Lives Matter More in Ukraine
04 Jan 2023
The open white supremacy and fascism exhibited in Ukraine are conveniently swept under the rug. Nazis are bad, unless they serve the interests of the U.S. state.
Editors, The Black Agenda Review
DECLARATION: The Commander in Chief, Jean-Jacques Dessalines, to the People of Hayti, Gonaives, January 1, 1804
04 Jan 2023
A round-up of The Black Agenda Review’s posts from 2022 – and a reprint of Haiti’s January 1, 1804 declaration of independence.