Skip to Content

Obama Bound for Mount Rushmore?

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version

 

by BAR executive editor Glen Ford

President Obama’s healthcare plan, now vetted by the U.S. Supreme Court, is the spawn of Republican reactionaries, “based on the principle that people should pay for their own bodily maintenance.” It bears no resemblance to world-class healthcare systems, “expanding the healthcare compact only for those who are destitute, while turning everyone else into profit-centers for corporations.” Obama has locked in the past, and put up a roadblock to the future – just as the right-wingers that invented the “individual mandate” intended.

 

Obama Bound for Mount Rushmore?

by BAR executive editor Glen Ford

Obama has succeeded in passing the Right’s program, created to stop what looked like the inevitable triumph of a single-payer system.”

President Obama, as his aides will tell anyone within hearing distance, wants to go down in history as one of the “greats.” Most African Americans, purely for reasons of group affirmation, would also love to see the First Black President beaming from Mount Rushmore (in the Black Hills of South Dakota, no less!), alongside George and Thomas the Slave Masters, Teddy the Arch Imperialist, and Lincoln the Emancipator.

Most of the U.S. corporate media – those who make the first drafts of history acceptable to the ruling class – also want Obama to have a shot at a place in the pantheon, since he has done some service to the rulers. The U.S. Supreme Court’s vetting of Obama’s healthcare legislation, according to the New York Times, is a “personal reprieve…leaving intact his hopes of joining the ranks of Franklin D. Roosevelt, Lyndon B. Johnson and Ronald Reagan as presidents who fundamentally altered the course of the country.” Obama has often compared himself to all three, agreeing with Reagan that the Sixties was a decade plagued by “excesses” – which, to Reagan’s mind, included Lyndon Johnson’s expansive social legislation.

As the Times tells it, Obama has nearly completed the work of his predecessors. “Not just Roosevelt and Johnson, but Harry S. Truman, Nixon and Mr. Clinton all tried and failed to move the country toward universal health coverage.” Obama’s bill is historic because it “seeks to end the status of the United States as the world’s only rich country with millions of involuntarily uninsured citizens.”

Obamacare is, at best, a detour, and more likely an historic setback to the movement for a truly national health care policy.”

The Times resorts to crazily contorted wording to convince us the Affordable Care Act is the next logical step in the civilizing of the United States; that it bears some resemblance to universal health care as practiced in the rest of the developed world – an outrageous distortion of fact and history. Obamacare, like previous Republican healthcare schemes, is based on the principle that people should pay for their own bodily maintenance, and that “free riders” must be forced into the private pool. It expands the healthcare compact only for those who are destitute, while turning everyone else into profit-centers for corporations. That’s not the direction universal healthcare advocates have been trying to go, all these years. It is, at best, a detour, and more likely an historic setback to the movement for a truly national health care policy.

The first U.S. entitlement programs evolved from pension plans for Civil War veterans and their families. “By 1910,” according to the Social Welfare History Project, “Civil War veterans and their survivors enjoyed a program of disability, survivors and old-age benefits similar in some ways to the later Social Security programs.” In 1935, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed into law the Social Security Act, which also included provisions for unemployment insurance. Harry Truman unsuccessfully proposed National Health Insurance, starting in 1945. Lyndon Johnson introduced Medicare and Medicaid with his Social Security Act of 1965. Ever since, the struggle has been to expand these programs to the entire population, as a matter of right – as was occurring globally even in formerly “Third World” places like Taiwan.

Even in the last days of President Reagan’s reactionary rule, the trajectory of American healthcare sentiment was arching towards universal single-payer.”

Entitlements” have been the bugaboo of the Right since the New Deal. But even in the last days of President Reagan’s reactionary rule, the trajectory of American healthcare sentiment was arching towards universal single-payer – the world-class solution. The Heritage Foundation, founded in the early Seventies by arch-reactionaries, saw the handwriting on the wall – and took preemptive action in 1989. As Chris Weigant wrote in the Huffington Post, Heritage commissioned its Director of Domestic Policy Strategies, Stuart Butler, to produce the Right’s own “Framework for Reform” of healthcare – one that kept the profits locked in and diverted the public from single-payer healthcare as a universal entitlement. Everyone would be pushed into the “market-based” – for-profit – pool. Stuart wrote:

This means that, while government would take on the obligation to find ways of guaranteeing care for those Americans unable to obtain protection in the market, perhaps because of chronic health problems or lack of income, Americans with sufficient means would no longer be able to be ‘free riders’ on society by avoiding sensible health insurance expenditures and relying on others to pay for care in an emergency or in retirement.”

Republican Bob Dole ran for president on an “individual mandate” health plan, the same concept Romney implemented in Massachusetts. It’s also the Obama scheme, as Chris Weigant concluded in the Huffington Post: “The individual mandate which was included in Obamacare is so close to what Stuart Butler of the Heritage Foundation initially suggested that we can honestly say there is no appreciable difference between the two.”

If Obama belongs in a pantheon, it’s a Republican one. He is not completing the healthcare project begun by FDR in 1935. Obama has, instead, succeeded in passing the Right’s program, created to stop what looked like the inevitable triumph of a single-payer system under which most insurance companies would go extinct. Just three years ago, it seemed that the day had finally come for some form of Medicare-for-all, which has long enjoyed the support of roughly two-thirds of the public. Obama pulled a switch. Supreme Court Justice John Roberts, a stalwart of the Right who is young enough to keep his eye on the future, knew a good deal for his side when he saw one, and signed off on it. He’s a lot smarter than those deluded Lefties who want to send Obama to Mount Rushmore.

BAR executive editor Glen Ford can be contacted at Glen.Ford@BlackAgendaReport.com.

Share this

Comments

Defacing mountains

What a despicable thing to do to a mountain.  I suppose some time in the future, we'll have the faces of Reagan, "W", and Clinton carved onto the side of the moon that faces us.

Obama on Rushmore?  Why not?  How about right next to that son of a bitch Teddy Roosevelt, who would have loved to have had drones for his imperial genocide in the Phillipines.

"When obama came to town"

VIDEO:

Pontiac, Michigan [51.1% black; over 21% unemployment]:

The destruction of an American city

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2012/jul2012/vide-j06.shtml

here you go bev

A debate between Carla Howell, Executive Director of the National Libertarian Party, and Gail Parker of the Virginia Green Party

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZOxKmIPGKw

Tarpley is for modern nuke energy, which we may not like, but Carla Howell is going to make you think: "hell to the naw" the next time somebody mentions Gary Johnson.

Not saying that the U.S. National Greens would go along with this, but this is what the National Greens are doing in Australia:

"The Labor-Greens carbon tax hoax"

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2012/jul2012/carb-j06.shtml

http://socialequality.com/
http://socialequality.com/
http://socialequality.com/
http://socialequality.com/
http://socialequality.com/
http://socialequality.com/

Be very leery of 3rd Parties & their candidates

The   Green  Party   has   a   questionable   past  concerninig  its   relationship   with  the    democratic   party.  In   2004,    its   Presidential   nominee  David  Cobb  ran  a   "safe  states"   strategy;  in  other  words,  he   wouldn't   campaign in  states   in  which    the Bush-Kerry   race  was   very  close.   Incredibly,   the  GP  Vice  Presidential   nominee,  Pat  LaMarche,  said  she   might  not   vote   for  herself,  if  the  race  was  close  in  her   state.

     The  Green  Parties  in  Germany   and  Ireland   were   much  more   successful  than  in   the   U.S;  and   they   gradually   started  embracing the   dominant   parties   views.

The  Libertarian Party and  its  nominee  Gary   Johnson are  economic   Darwinists.  A  quick   web  search    reveals  his   views  on  health  care: " A health care insurance system that is privately owned and managed is the best approach to solving our health care problems."  They   feel   the  same  way  about   social   security, medicare,   minimum   wage. They  want   government   to  really   get  out  of  our   lives.  On  the   other  hand,  they  oppose    drug  laws  and   foreign   wars.

Rocky  Anderson   just    recently   left   the   Democratic  Party.  I'm   not    convinced   he's  one  of  the  untouchables  like   Cynthia   Mckinney  or   Ralph   Nader  who can't  be   bought  off.   

 

 

  

The more things change, the more they stay the same...

Funny illustration of Whites railing against "big guberment" programs in the 1860s:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/33/Freedman%27s_bureau.jpg

"The Bureau of Refugees, Freedmen, and Abandoned Lands, usually referred to as simply the Freedmen's Bureau, was a U.S. federal government agency that aided distressed freedmen (freed slaves) in 1865–1869, during the Reconstruction era of the United States."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedmens_Bureau



Clicky Web Analytics
blog | by Dr. Radut