Mass Black Incarceration Ending? Don't Hold Your Breath
A Black Agenda Radio commentary by Glen Ford
It’s been two generations since the beginning of modern mass Black incarceration. Prison populations, which only doubled from 1925 to 1972, increased more than seven-fold over the next 38 years, with Blacks accounting for ever higher proportions of inmates. The latest statistics do not indicate that white people “have reconsidered – or even acknowledged – their extraordinarily broad support for placing more Black people in captivity over the past 40 years than at any time since slavery.”
Mass Black Incarceration Ending? Don't Hold Your Breath
A Black Agenda Radio commentary by Glen Ford
“Half of the states reported decreases in their prison populations.”
For the first time since 1972, the total number of people held in U.S. prisons has gone down. And, for the second year in a row, the number of persons under supervision – such as parole – by state departments of correction, decreased.
Does this mean the beginning of the end of mass Black incarceration in the United States? Not hardly. That would require an historic reversal of a nationwide policy to find new places to put Black people who refused to stay “in their place,” in the wake of the Civil Rights and Black Power Movements. There is little in the current American political conversation that indicates white people have reconsidered – or even acknowledged – their extraordinarily broad support for placing more Black people in captivity over the past 40 years than at any time since slavery.
It takes the government almost a year to tabulate the past year’s prison statistics, so the latest numbers are from 2010. They show about 7.1 million people under some kind of correctional supervision – one out of every 33. That’s down 1.3 percent from 2009, the year that saw the first decrease in supervision in two generations. The total population in state and federal prisons – not counting local jails – stood at 1.6 million inmates, down six-tenths of one percent. State prison populations decreased by almost 11,000, and local jails by almost 19,000, but federal prison populations grow by eight/tenths of one percent, to almost 210,000 inmates. That was, however, the smallest percentage increase in a generation – since 1980.
Half of the states reported decreases in their prison populations, with California and Georgia shrinking the most.
“Twenty-four states and the federal prison system increased their inmate populations.”
Speculation on why prison populations have, at least temporarily, peaked, centers on the financial crisis. It is true that states are experiencing unprecedented difficulties paying their bills. Some states have clearly responded to their fiscal crises by finding ways to incarcerate fewer people. Michigan reduced its prison population by 6,000 inmates in three years, mainly by decreasing the number of inmates who wind up serving more time in jail than they were originally sentenced to. California is under court order to cut its prison population by 30 percent, or 40,000 inmates. But the court order came too late to have a significant effect on 2010 prison numbers.
Only half the country has seen any decrease, at all. Twenty-four states and the federal prison system increased their inmate populations, with Illinois, Texas and Arkansas leading the pack. And states have found other ways to cut down on inmate costs without putting fewer people in prison, through wholesale privatization of prisons, and imposition of draconian fees on prisoners, probationers and parolees.
The Pew Research Center on the States cites programs that divert some offenders to probation, and accelerated release of low-risk inmates. However, studies have shown that such diversion programs tend to serve disproportionately white offenders. Therefore, it is highly premature for anyone to speculate that the era of mass Black incarceration may be ending. For the foreseeable future, one out of eight of the world’s prison inmates will continue to be African American.
For Black Agenda Radio, I’m Glen Ford. On the web, go to BlackAgendaReport.com.
BAR executive editor Glen Ford can be contacted at Glen.Ford@BlackAgendaReport.com.
You are missing some Flash content that should appear here! Perhaps your browser cannot display it, or maybe it did not initialise correctly.
- Login or register to post comments
Email this page
Printer-friendly version




















Comments
Black Leaders Who Refuse to Uphold the Oath of Office.........
http://www.ceyseau.net/BOClarenceThomas.html
http://www.ceyseau.net/AClerkJudgmentisUneforceable.html
http://www.ceyseau.net/
Elected black leaders, without regard to political party affiliation, who refuse to uphold his or her oath of Office, or other individuals, who have contempt for the U.S. Constitution, any respective State Constitution, the "Rule of Law", etc., contribute to the demise of Black men, women, and/or his or her siblings........the demise being "Unequal Justice and Protection Under the Law" that can result in unwarranted penal incarceration, blatantly illegal or unfair court decisions, blatant violation of property rights by the atrocities of government, the illegal break up of law abiding black families for profit, and/or other unlawful Jim Crow/Black Code practices that are very real, even today.
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-182700
The value of an elected official, criminal or civil defense lawyer is gauged by the competency of a lawyer to use the Constitution, the rule of law, tort practice to represent a client, especially a client egregiously violated by the atrocities of government.
14th Amendment, USC, Section 1: “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
Article 1, Section 7, of the California Constitution states: " A person may not be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law or denied equal protection of the laws...." and Article 1, Section 26 states: " The provisions of the constitution are mandatory and prohibitory, unless by express words they are declared to be otherwise".
http://voices.yahoo.com/black-leaders-support-ku-klux-klan-8321947.html?cat=75
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-287435
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-278743
http://ceyseau.net/files/The_Real_Uncle_Tom_s_.pdf
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-265276
Surely there is at least one black elected official, black lawyer around who is ethical, competent, not sleazy or spineless and who lives by the principles to which this nation stands, and is not afraid to take on government, in behalf of a any law abiding U.S. born descendant of slavery egregiously violated by government.
Sad to say
Sad to say that there are this kind of discrimination during those time... a huge betrayal of human rights... personal statement examples