Skip to Content

Jay-Z is 1%, Not HipHop

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version

 

by Damon Sajnani

Jay-Z has earned mountains of money from HipHop, but “his politics are diametrically opposed to the interest of Black liberation at home and abroad.” The music mogul identifies with an oligarchy whose interests are antithetical to Black liberation. “If the balance of one’s material promotes the interest of the oppressor, that rapper is not HipHop.

 

Jay-Z is 1%, Not HipHop

by Damon Sajnani

Black culture is a counter-culture to—not merely a sub-culture of—American culture.”

Jay-Z is a highly talented rapper—he has undeniable lyrical skill. Of course, so do tens of thousands of other rappers who you will never hear of. As we know, talent is far from the primary arbiter of success in industry. Something more explains his ascendance. He is also an adept businessman who organically understands the profitability of promoting the interests of oligarchy in such a way that the masses mistake those interests as their own. This process, whereby the ideas of the ruling class permeate society as the ruling ideas, is the exercise of hegemony. Hegemony—though often used interchangeably with imperialism—has a distinct meaning. It is the stage after imperialism, once imperialists have gained their dominance through violence and coercion, they move to consolidate their power by cultivating the consent of the colonized. This is the creation of what Malcolm X derogated as the mentality of the “house Negro,” by which the oppressed identify with the oppressor.

The dominant class must always perpetuate such a mentality among subordinates, and this manifests as official—or mainstream—culture. Culture is the framework by which distinct groups attribute meaning to the social and material world. It frames, explains, and justifies the operation of its social formation. As such, it is the deepest level of ideology. American culture frames, explains, and justifies what America is and does.

Jay-Z is an adept businessman who organically understands the profitability of promoting the interests of oligarchy in such a way that the masses mistake those interests as their own.”

America is the reigning, though waning, seat of capitalist imperialism. Among other things, it is an enslaver of Africans, exterminator of aboriginals, environmental devastator, global terrorist, captain of neo-colonialism and chief beneficiary of these crimes. To be pro-American does not mean that you support Americans, but that you buy into the propaganda that allows the richest Americans to collude with the richest global elites elsewhere, to the detriment of the world’s people including the majority of Americans. American culture is the set of beliefs, practices and ways of living that support America as such.

Black culture is anti-American. To many, especially in the contemporary moment, this statement seems fallacious, even infuriating. But a clear understanding of culture as outlined above, and of Blackness as outlined below, makes the truth self-evident. As countless Black scholars at least since Du Bois have shown, race is a social construct not a biological fact. The context of this construction is European colonialism and trans-Atlantic African enslavement. This is the socio-politico-economic underpinning of the modern concept of race and the dominant racial groupings that exist today. This racial hierarchy created whiteness as the pinnacle group to justify the domination and exploitation of all other groups. Despite the formal abolition of slavery, colonization, and legally explicit racial segregation (except in places like Palestine-Israel), these institutions continue in modified forms and Whiteness continues to globally bestow privilege on whites as well as those of us who opt to collude with white supremacy. In every defensible sense—material, psychological—it is in the interests of Black people to oppose white supremacy. Of course, as we all know, this does not mean it is in the interests of every black person to oppose it—since collaboration is sometimes a question of personal survival and other times a lucrative prospect—but blackness is a collective identity, regardless of individual interests, the collectives interests are opposed to white supremacy by definition.

In every defensible sense—material, psychological—it is in the interests of Black people to oppose white supremacy.”

Interests are the basis of ideology and, as mentioned above, culture is the most fundamental level of the ideological. This is the understanding from which all luminaries of Black consciousness have proceeded: Du Bois, Garvey, Fanon, Cabral, Malcolm X, Newton etc., all recognized that black liberation required the cultivation of Black culture. Black culture, in the context of the world we live in, is by definition a counterculture to white supremacy. Therefore it is necessarily a counter-hegemonic formation to the reigning beneficiary and enforcer of the new iterations of the old white supremacy—America.

Writers on Black culture have always acknowledged that Black culture is a counter-culture to—not merely a sub-culture of—American culture, but they rarely appreciate the import of the word “counter” in this context. It means that when we judge whether a cultural production is Black or not, we cannot determine this simply by considering the race of the creator. We have to consider the cultural values that are embedded in the production. Do they promote global Black solidarity and liberation or do they profess fidelity to America and perpetuate the myth of American nobility? In an America that jails more people than anyone in the world, where poverty and destitution is more widespread than under Jim Crow, and on a planet where Euro-America still helms a global economy that sucks the blood of two-thirds of the worlds people—mostly black and Brown—these options are mutually exclusive.

HipHop is not merely music, it is a culture—it is an explicit, powerful, confrontational iteration of Black culture. It arose among disenfranchised Black and Brown youth in the Bronx to manifest their freedom and voice their humanity, and has been taken up worldwide to combat oppression globally. Some argue that the political intentions of early HipHop—and by extension HipHop tout court—have been overstated. It is argued, for instance, that much HipHop has always been more about partying than politics. But a distaste for party politics should not elide the politics of partying. In other words, this misapprehension of HipHop’s inherent politics proceeds from a narrow understanding of politics, that fails to recognize the political significance of manifesting self-love and asserting one’s entitlement to joy under a system and amidst a culture that constructs love and happiness as the commodified preserve of the wealthy and (mostly) white.

A rapper is measured by lyrical skills—or at least used to be. An Emcee is measured by fidelity to HipHop culture, which entails solidarity with Black liberation. This does not mean an Emcee must be Black, nor that all their material most be expressly political, but it does mean that if the balance of one’s material promotes the interest of the oppressor, that rapper is not HipHop.

Jay-Z is about the one percent and he is as pro-America as one can get.”

I opened by noting Jay-Z’s proficiency as a rapper and business savvy in terms of recognizing the profitability of collaboration with oligarchy. In his 2012 electoral campaign ad for Obama, the president says, “to me the idea of America is that no matter who you are, what you look like or where you come from you can make it if you try, Jay-Z did. He didn’t come from power or privilege; he got ahead because he worked hard.” Of course, this is not just Obama’s idea of America, this is the simplest and most familiar expression of the American ethos—a blatant disavowal of the factual reality of systemic socioeconomic stratification and the intersectional oppressions of race, class and gender.

When interviewed by CNN about the economic crisis, and the asymmetric recovery whereby rich people and corporations profit while “main street” does not, Jay-Z responded, “What we have to be really clear about is that America is built on free enterprise, so we don’t want to knock anyone for being successful in America[.]” Right, the “free enterprise” of slavery. Tellingly, his push back against any economic analysis of oppression is so sweeping that the interviewer interprets his comment as an endorsement of Romney over Obama. He promptly clarifies himself, however, making it clear that he supports Obama while admitting “I don’t know anything about… Mitt Romney.” Jay’s defense of “successful businessmen” is a rhetorical counterattack on the Occupy movement—which Jay pondered capitalizing upon by selling “Occupy T-Shirts” and keeping the profits but whose message he has no sympathy towards.

It is clear that Jay-Z is about the one percent and he is as pro-America as one can get. As Lowkey put it, “we have to question, when the US government loves the same rappers that you love, whose interests are those rappers serving?” Contrary to Jay’s ostensive HipHop swag, his politics are diametrically opposed to the interest of Black liberation at home and abroad. Like Obama, he is a mouthpiece for imperialism, corporate America’s best yet embodiment of the co-optation of HipHop and the reassertion of hegemony. Don’t get it twisted, the struggle continues.

Damon Sajnani is a HipHop artist, activist and academic, also known as ProfessorD.us. Twitter: @profd

Share this

Comments

Jay-Z

       By posting I hope to contribute to the conversation not disrupt or insult anyone. Further, I would hope that any additional contribution to the conversation would be to bring a different insight to bare while not challenging anyone perspective on this matter. I would also like to ask the elders for permission to speak. By you continuing to read I will take that as permission to continue to speak.

         Perhaps we did not hear him when he said he was a Black Republican on the NAS song featuring Jay-Z called "Black Republicans." Further, this is a symptom of what he, Barack, Oprah, Corey Booker...etc stand for, which is the "cross over."

Meaning one can be as successful as he or she wants selling to or serving the Black community but one hasn't really made it until one has crossed over to the mainstream. Then you hear these same people talking about universalism and the need for people of color to not self segregate.

Or they will say that they are not interested in selling just to Black kids or as Mike Jordan once quipped conservative buy sneakers too. Or when Obama says he isn't just the president of Black America. He then goes to every other single possible constiuency to explain exacting what his plan is for helping them while no one says to him, "you are not the president of Israel or just Soccer moms or just Nascar dads or just Waitress moms (all of which are euphemism for white people)."

Black kids are taught that when they look into the mirror in the morning they are looking at the cause of most of their problems. They are told it is the clothes they wear (baggy and or saggin pants) that prevents people from hiring them. They are told that graduating top ten in their class means little because they attended an inferior school (See U Texas case). They are told their parents don't care enough for them to destroy public education in favor of psuedo-public Charter schools (Race to the Top). They are told the cost of feeding them, housing them, clothing them, education, and caring for them when they get sick is too high a cost to pay(austerity budgets).

Lastly they are bombarded with advertisement for product they can not afford (most notably these days liquor) by companies who will never hire them and are then told by people like Jay-Z that their worth is measured by how much of this stuff you can accumulate.

      This is why my concern at this point is that, this way of thinking is on the ascendancy within the Black community and those of us who see this as problematic will soon be facing an onslaught of "responsible Black leadership" funded by moneyed interest that don't see Black people as viable political entity.

      Maybe I'm just one of the sheeple or Bleeple who longs to try on some of that tribalism that Black people are thought to practice but has never made an appearance here in Buffalo, NY.

SELLOUTS

Sean Carter and Chris Bridges have forgotten where they came from.



Clicky Web Analytics
Dr. Radut | blog