Freedom Rider: Charter School Lobby Buys Elections
by BAR editor and senior columnist Margaret Kimberley
When hedge funds invade the public schools arena, we are no longer talking about education, but of markets. Obama's version of education reform is to turn the schools into profit centers for the speculator class. “Education is up for grabs and at the mercy of the highest bidders and the most cynical and ambitious.”
Freedom Rider: Charter School Lobby Buys Elections
by BAR editor and senior columnist Margaret Kimberley
“If profit is the primary motive for the hedge fund managers’ actions, then public education as it has been known for decades will soon be on its death bed.”
Rich people have always had the ability to bend electoral politics to their collective will. They determine who has the opportunity to run for office and sadly, more often than not, they determine who will win. This subversion of democracy is now on full display in races across the country in which politicians who have rightly questioned the mania for charter schools have been targeted for defeat by the charter school industry and its lobby.
New York state is one of the recipients of Race to the Top funds. It has been awarded $700 million from the federal government in exchange for a promise to undermine public education. In New York and other states long term incumbent state legislators are now facing unknown but suddenly well funded newcomers whose campaigns have been bankrolled entirely by hedge fund investors who are making a fast buck from the charter school industry.
There is nothing wrong with incumbents facing challenges to prove their political value to their constituents. There is something very wrong when those challenges come about because elected officials represent their constituents by choosing to fight the wave of charter schools and then risk electoral defeat for doing the right thing.
“Incumbent state legislators are now facing unknown but suddenly well funded newcomers whose campaigns have been bankrolled entirely by hedge fund investors who are making a fast buck from the charter school industry.”
As one challenger of a New York City state senator put it, “The checks started rolling in“ after wealthy charter school backers began supporting his and other’s campaigns for office. This sudden largesse and alleged concern for public education proves beyond any doubt that the charter school movement is a gigantic fraud, a mirage created for the sole purpose of enriching one class of people at the expense of millions of children whose right to an education will be jeopardized.
These challengers are not hard to find. Democrats for Education Reform is an organization which makes its agenda crystal clear. Its goal is to further the interests of the privatizers and it is clear in its support of fund raising efforts for candidates who support its educational policies.
Its board is a who’s who of hedge fund managers and politicians like Washington D.C. mayor Adrian Fenty and Newark, New Jersey mayor Cory Booker. These are names long known for an eagerness to establish cozy relationships with rich people who want to impose their will on the public sector. This process is certainly not new, but under the Obama administration has taken on a level of respectability that never existed during the Bush years.
The Obama administration’s cynically named Race to the Top inflicts the worst kind of bribery on states and cities. If they do not agree to privatize and therefore destroy the public education system which they are obligated to protect, they walk away empty handed. Tails they lose, and heads they lose too.
“The charter school movement is a gigantic fraud, a mirage created for the sole purpose of enriching one class of people at the expense of millions of children.”
Common sense should tell anyone that hedge fund managers will not have any interest in insuring educational excellence for all children. They are interested in profit, and if profit is the primary motive for their actions, then public education as it has been known for decades will soon be on its death bed. If politicians have to fear being ousted from office because they demand accountability for charter schools, the demands will soon disappear and the Fentys, Bookers and their backers will have won the day.
There is no sector of society that is safe from capitalism run amuck. Our health care system is a for-profit monstrosity, which provides substandard care and outrageous profits to corporate interests. Housing bubbles have taken away the only assets millions of people own and destroyed entire communities. Now education is up for grabs and at the mercy of the highest bidders and the most cynical and ambitious.
When the dust clears from this election cycle there will be fewer political voices protecting the right to a decent education in public schools and the rights of teachers and administrators to carry out their mandate as they see fit. They may keep their principles but they will have learned a hard lesson, namely that they may also pay a price for speaking out against the charter school racket. The candidates with checks rolling in will increase in number and so will the unaccountable charter schools. The usual suspects will be the winners and the people will lose one more vestige of a supposedly civilized society.
Margaret Kimberley's Freedom Rider column appears weekly in BAR, and is widely reprinted elsewhere. She maintains a frequently updated blog as well as at http://freedomrider.blogspot.com. Ms. Kimberley lives in New York City, and can be reached via e-Mail at Margaret.Kimberley(at)BlackAgandaReport.com.






















Comments
The Charter School Myth!!
http://dailycensored.com/2010/04/01/charter-schools-the-white-man%E2%80%99s-panacea-for-education/
http://dailycensored.com/2010
http://dailycensored.com/2010/04/01/charter-schools-the-white-man%E2%80%99s-panacea-for-education/how much Great article. Thank you for sharing this!!!
@struggle
Thank you, that was a powerful essay. Everybody should read it and share it.
Maybe there's hope??
I would be interested in hearing from "Chocolate City" residents about the Mayoral race where it appears Adrian Fenty got trounced because the citizenry wasn't buying his and his Education Leader's warmed over "charter school scheme." Seems both Mr. Fenty and Ms. Rhee was perceived as "aloof and out of touch." Appears Fenty's loss was due to Rhee's arrogance and plan to gut D.C. public schools. Looks like there was a whole lot of grandstranding, and primping about "educational reform" but the citizenry smelled a rat. My observations stem from the comments, enjoy. Not everybody is buying this attack on public education disguised as "school reform." Perhaps there's hope afterall.
There's at least one election the charter school profiteers couldn't buy. Hats off to the Chocolate City.
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dcschools/2010/09/rhee_election_result_...
Wanted to share another perspective
4 Reasons to Change the Way We Think About School
by Mary Hickcox / September 15th, 2010
http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/09/4-reasons-to-change-the-way-we-think-a...
Reason #4 really hit home:
"The wrong people control the system for the wrong reasons."
THE SCHOOL PRIVATIZATION MOVEMENT HAS A 30 YEAR HEAD START
In a system of winners and LOSERS, someone wins and someone loses.
Suburban public schools win; urban public schools lose.
Charter schools that are good at cherrypicking their students win; charter schools that are bad at cherrypicking their students lose.
The system of winners and LOSERS is not designed to educate *ALL* children; therefore, it is destined to fail. Teacher burnout is real and there aren't enough Ivy League, resume builders to replace them. The Obama clones better get their's now before they get Fenty-ed.
Amen
A couple of observations.
"The Obama clones better get their's now before they get Fenty-ed."
No shit. I have yet to have a conversation with an African American in education and heard a complaint about NCLB, charter schools, or our two-tiered educational system. They just don't (want to?) get it. I'm more upset about NCLB or Race to the Top or whatever gimic is the flava of the year than they are.
They don't grasp apparently that the current system is designed to perfect winners and losers, not assist those who need it. As an aside, let me add that we can go back more than 30 years, I say go back to "integration" and "feminism." Integration should have been about economic equity/integration and not "diversity" because--fast forword to the present--and we see that as long as RESIDENTIAL PATTERNS are what they are, "racial integration" is pissing in the wind. It explains why the Federal courts gave up on bussing as a remedy. White folks appear to have understood that NEIGHBORHOOD INTEGRITY was sancrosanct, Black folks got caught up in "moving on up."
I was listening to a brother on NPR this week reminescing about the former Detroit School System that successfully experimented with All Male schools targeting Black males. Let's remember that many successful, innovative ALL MALE BLACK SCHOOLS were assaulted by the "Feministas" with their ideological frothing at the mouth. The caller reminded us that it was the "ideologically pure" Feminists that closed successful All Male Black Schools in Detroit, despite their unequivocal successes in education. Funny, education is always "local" unless the local control gets in the way of somebody's agenda.
By the way, where is the "Feminist Movement" today? Let's be clear I love and adore strong, indepependent, financially and emotionally secure women, but fast forward today and I hear women on the boob tube (pardon the pun) calling each other bitches and hoes, fighting over men like 16 year olds, and showing more crotch and cleavage than Hustler Magazine. (You might call it "the Race to the Bottom"; who can be the biggest and worse "Bridezilla," I mean bitch ... er ho. Long live Snookie, Lindsay, Brittany and the Housewives!!!) lol
I ain't completely mad, I wish every ass looked like the one in the Reebox Easytone commerical and Blacks have a epidemic of obesity to boot. But I don't hear the Feministas now complaining about the fact that women are the majority enrollees at our colleges and universitites. That doesn't bother me per se, but it's clear that by their way of thinking, "what's good for the gander ain't always what's good for the goose," is it?? Political correctness is horseshit.
Sadly, unless educators break their enthrallment with their union sell-outs and their darling President who's assaulting their profession, they'll continue their suicidal march forward. Stupidity or lack of critical thinking, you be the judge.
WHOSE FIX?
How does one go about fixing something that has rarely ever actually worked? For most of this country's history, the white majority has been implacably hostile to the idea of universal education. For some strange reason, many of those who fled rigged and unjust education systems in Europe were more than happy to impose their own versions of rigged and unjust education systems on others here, especially Black ones. In general, Blacks were either kept out of the education system or were only allowed in with the understanding that they would only be "trained" as laborers and kept at the lowest economic rungs of society in racially isolated, dysfunctional second and third rate "schools." As long as the most members of the American mainstream continue to view education as either a scarce commodity which is to be carefully doled out only to the "deserving", or as a means of social control/brainwashing, all the talk of cross-the-board reforms is nothing but noise.
Your are correct, however...
Totally agree. My preference would be for African Americans to take advantage of home schooling exemptions, to magnify or "supersize" that concept, taking it to a broader scale, AND TEACH THEIR OWN.
However, unfortunately the African American mindset is one of "dependency," "we can't do it until the White Man does it for us." So for right now the only feasible alternative is to at least educate people about the charter school fraud, the attack on public education, the "dumbing down" in our school systems, the need for parental involvement, and the need for the federal government to get off it's standardized tests gimics.
At this point I don't know what else is doable. ..Well.. I do, but the necessary mindset to operationalize it isn't there. And unitl it is, the question you pose will indeed remain a constant: "Whose fix is it?"