Black America: Sinking to a New “Bottom”?
by BAR executive editor Glen Ford
by BAR executive editor Glen Ford
Help us to keep doing this. Make a one-time donation in any amount today.
Or guarantee our survival with a recurring monthly contribution. Choose an amount & click "subscribe."

AA Political Opinion
AA Political Pundit
Counterpunch
The African Union
Africa News
Afro-Netizen
Afrospear
AllAfrica
All Things Pass
alternet
Angry Arab
angry black bitch
Angry Black Woman
Black Commentator
black electorate
Blackfolks
Blackprof
blacksmythe
burbank digest
BuzzFlash
Chicago Reporter
Chicken Bones
Chris Floyd
Color of Change
Consortium News
Corrente
Crew of 42
Daily Kos
Dallas South
Dan Freeman Report
Democracy Now!
Democratic Underground
The Distant Ocean
Electronic Intifada
Electronic Iraq
Electronic Village
Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting
Field negro
Firedoglake
Flashpoints
Francis Holland
Free Press
Free Speech Radio News
Freedom Rider
Global Exchange
Global Research
Gorilla's Guides
Hornafrik
Howling Latina
Huffington Post
Informed Comment
Insurgent American
Jack and Jill Politics
The Jerusalem Fund
Latina Lista
Left Business Observer
Left Turn
Liberal Oasis
Media Matters
Mediachannel
Mike Fluggenock
Mirror on America
Mo’ Kelly Report
Mydd
negrophile
O Bummer
Op-Ed News
Pam's House Blend
Pambazuka
Physicians 4 Natl Health Care
Playahata
Power of Narrative
Prometheus 6
Radio4All.Net
Republic of T
RiverDaughter
socalmuchacha
Sourcewatch
Stan Goff
Stop Me Before I Vote Again
Super Spade
the unapologetic mexican
Thought Merchant
Tom Paine
TransAfrica
TomDispatch
TruthDig
TruthOut
Venezuelanalysis
Venezuelanalysis
Voice of Detroit
Vivian Paige
Z-Net
Click the flash players below to hear or the mics to download these Black Agenda Radio Commentaries.
You are missing some Flash content that should appear here! Perhaps your browser cannot display it, or maybe it did not initialise correctly.
You are missing some Flash content that should appear here! Perhaps your browser cannot display it, or maybe it did not initialise correctly.
You are missing some Flash content that should appear here! Perhaps your browser cannot display it, or maybe it did not initialise correctly.
You are missing some Flash content that should appear here! Perhaps your browser cannot display it, or maybe it did not initialise correctly.
You are missing some Flash content that should appear here! Perhaps your browser cannot display it, or maybe it did not initialise correctly.
You are missing some Flash content that should appear here! Perhaps your browser cannot display it, or maybe it did not initialise correctly.
You are missing some Flash content that should appear here! Perhaps your browser cannot display it, or maybe it did not initialise correctly.
You are missing some Flash content that should appear here! Perhaps your browser cannot display it, or maybe it did not initialise correctly.
Please know that being our “friend” or “liking” us on Facebook does not guarantee that you'll see Black Agenda Report's posts in your news feed. Facebook arbitrarily limits the reach of persons and business to 15% of “friends” and “likes”. The only way to be sure you receive weekly updates from Black Agenda Report is to sign up for our weekly email alerts on the left side of this page.


Chicago-based historian and activist Paul Street cuts through the fog of fantasy and wish-fulfillment that makes up much of political discourse in the U.S. left for a sober assessment of the Obama administration in the real world of power and empire. The Empire's New Clothes uniquely measures Obama's record against the expectations many of his supporters hoped he would live up to. Taken together, it is a startling indictment not just of the current president and his people-proof, reform-proof but an indictment of what passes for the U.S. left.
Was the US and NATO's Libyan intervention a humanitarian campaign to protect Libyans against Muammar Gaddafi’s threats of mass violence and genocide, or was it a cynically “rehearsed military expedition” to force regime change and wield Western authority in the region? Far from being an action to save lives, NATO’s “indiscriminate” bombing of civilian targets and cities such as Sirte (Gaddafi’s birthplace) resulted in genocide, ethnic cleansing, crimes against humanity, and civil war..
African scholar Mahmood Mamdani challenges the fabricated
stats and fraudelent history popularized by the Save Darfur Coalition and the advocates of robust U.S. military intervention in Sudan. The Save Darfur Coalition, he argues is not a peace movement but a war dance, blocking a peaceful settlement by spreading falsified casualty figures, groundless charges of genocide, and offering the U.S. public an appealing but misleading case for military intervention.
The year that saw an African American run for the presidency as a viable contender also witnessed a truly remarkable silence. While millions of words written about the political ascent of one black man, there was virtually nothing about the descent of black leadership into well-nigh total ineffectiveness. Barack Obama’s personal itinerary was mapped in the minutest detail. The larger itinerary of African Americans was mostly ignored.
Comments
A lot of businesses are
A lot of businesses are sinking with this sinking economy. There's no wonder how and why is it happening. However, despite those quandaries, some entrepreneurs are still standing and fighting the crisis. Juliette Brindak's entrepreneurial spirit ought to serve as an inspiration to young people. CollegeNews.com accounts that her girls' site Miss O and Friends is phenomenon that is well worth $15 million. It began with cartoon drawings however soon became an internet social empire that outpaces the competitors.
Doesnt the South African situation sound a little familiar?
South Africa's black empowerment
The president says it has failed
To give more economic clout to the black majority has proved hard
http://www.economist.com/world/middle-east/displaystory.cfm?story_id=158...
IT IS now widely agreed that “black economic empowerment” (BEE) and affirmative-action laws brought in after apartheid as the star policies of the ruling African National Congress (ANC) have failed. Even President Jacob Zuma seems to agree. Instead of redistributing wealth and positions to the black majority, they have resulted mainly in “a few individuals benefiting a lot,” he says, while leaving the leadership of most big companies in white hands. The black masses, the intended beneficiaries, have hardly gained.
Largely as a result of the emergence of this new BEE elite, post-apartheid South Africa is still one of the most unequal countries in the world. Although poverty has been alleviated by providing welfare benefits to more than one in four of South Africa’s 49m inhabitants, the gulf between rich and poor has widened. The richest 4% of South Africans—a quarter of whom are black—now earn more than $80,000 a year, 100 times what most of their compatriots live on.
Under apartheid, blacks were given an inferior education and on the whole restricted to much worse jobs. The Employment Equity Act in 1998 tried to make the workforce “more broadly representative of our people” across the board. But more than a decade later, whites still hold three-quarters of senior jobs in private business whereas blacks have 12%, the exact reverse of their share in the working population.
Among the 295 companies listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE), blacks account for just 4% of chief executive officers, 2% of chief financial officers and 15% of other senior posts. In non-executive ones, they do a bit better, accounting for just over a quarter of board chairmen and 36% of directors, but still nowhere near their share of the workforce. Even so, many whites grumble sotto voce that incompetent blacks are being promoted beyond their abilities.
As whites account for 40% of university graduates, a 12% quota for whites in skilled or top managerial positions is absurd, the South African Institute of Race Relations, a think-tank, says. Its head, John Kane-Berman, argues that BEE, in the way it has so far been implemented, has actually harmed blacks by discouraging self-reliance and an entrepreneurial spirit. Instead it has fostered a debilitating sense of entitlement.
The idea of legislating for black economic empowerment was originally promoted by big white businessmen to ward off post-apartheid calls for nationalisation. If a few well-connected black people were given chunks of the action, big business would, they hoped, be left alone. In that sense, BEE has been a roaring success, as whites still own the bulk of the country’s wealth. Although renewed calls for the nationalisation of the mines and banks have recently been heard within ANC ranks, Mr Zuma, urged on by the new black capitalists, has repeatedly said that this is not on the government’s agenda.
Under BEE laws, white-owned companies with an annual revenue of at least 5m rand are given ratings for enabling blacks to own shares, improve their skills within the company, move up the managerial ranks, and so on. The higher the company’s score, the more likely it is to win lucrative public contracts. Everyone is supposed to win. Black individuals or companies could buy large holdings in white companies in the hope of paying off their debts through dividend payments and rising share prices.
For as long as buoyant stock markets were rising, this worked nicely. But when the global financial crisis caused shares to plummet, many BEE companies crashed, making new investors wary. In 2007 there were a record 111 BEE deals, worth 105 billion rand, involving companies listed on the JSE. In 2008 this fell to 84 deals, worth 61 billion rand. Last year, however, there were just 13 deals, worth 20 billion rand.
Moeletsi Mbeki, an analyst and entrepreneur who is a brother of the former president, Thabo Mbeki, claims that BEE has struck a “fatal blow against the emergence of black entrepreneurship by creating a small class of unproductive but wealthy black crony capitalists.” Yet most leading businessmen, white and black, still regard the policy as vital for the country’s future, though they admit it has been badly implemented. All seem to agree that the policy should be made to benefit a wider range of blacks, not just business people.
President Zuma promises a review. He complains that the country’s economic “transformation”, meaning the redistribution of power and wealth to the black majority, has been “disappointingly slow”. Last month he launched a new council to advise on a much “broader-based” BEE. Meanwhile, worried whites, whose skills are still sorely needed, are continuing to emigrate in droves.
.
.
Black unity missing as usual
The black middle class doesn't give a damn what happens to poor blacks much like the white middle class. Americans are hooked on the self and consuming as much as corporate America can provide using the over-inflated currency which is almost worthless overseas now. Blacks have no unity outside of small circles like the Nation of Islam. It's over for us because even after the Million Man March most of us went right back home and continued the same reckless behavior or worse. I will continue to fight injustice and speak out but the majority of us are lost and cannot be found. We have no roots since whites destroyed those. Feminism and Willie Lynch have reversed the gender roles so that women are the men now and men the women.
Basically everything outlined by the Jews in their Protocols of the Elders of Zion has been accomplished. They have destroyed black manhood in the media. They are destroying true Christianity by having modified the Bible to suit their own ends. Now they are working on destroying Catholicism. Without black unity we cannot get any land in this country or any other. Without land we are continually at the mercy of white people who either hate us or white apathy. There is nothing else to say. We cannot force lost black people to do what we know is right or what is good for them. If they want to continue to wallow in self-destruction that is their choice. If they refuse to hear the warning or listen to the wise council of blogs like this what can we do? Nothing.
We should cut those loose who have no chance of ever waking up and then maybe we can build from there. Once our numbers reach a certain level and the black community can see the positive effect we are having then others may get on board. Until then they are trusting in whitey and all of his false Gods and idols.
The other thing we must do is recreate the stigma for out of wedlock births. It is far too common to see single mothers these days. It should be an embarrassment to them to not have a good man around. That stigma would end this insanity and put gender roles back in their proper position after feminism damn near destroyed manhood and womanhood.
Need I say that feminism was started by the Jewish elite? White people may give us hell every day but it's Jews that have done the most damage to us over time starting with financing the ships during slavery. Most people don't know Jews started the NAACP. They used it simply to divide us from whites while they made off with the money. They've been doing this same Ponzi scheme for thousands of years which is why wise leaders have always relegated them to positions with no power.
Everything has a purpose.
Chris Rock once said something to the effect of, "Look at me. I'm young, good looking, talented, and rich. And there's not one of you white boys who would change places with me."
If blacks didn't exist, white people would invent them.
They are necessary as a reserve pool of labor to be used as a threat against uppity whites who still have a union to defend them. And their appalling economic plight is a reminder to
those same people, who see their standard of living heading south, their dreams of a comfortable retirement shattered, of how privileged they are--in comparison with blacks.
Don't Worry, " I'll pray for you 'Special Interest' Negroes" lol
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/05/AR201004...
"This meeting is not about politics," spokesman Corey Ealons said. "It is about connecting with key faith leaders on the challenges impacting our nation. President Obama appreciates the acute challenges facing African Americans across the country and respects the work these pastors are doing to support the communities they serve."
"The public show of support and its welcome by the White House is a shift from Obama's seeming detachment from the question of whether he should have a "black agenda." In the past, he has responded by saying that "a rising tide lifts all boats" and that his job "is to be president of the whole country." This time, he is letting the ministers sing his praises."
"He is the president of the United States, not just the president of black people, the president of Latino people," said Bishop Vashti Murphy McKenzie, a leader of the African Methodist Episcopal Church. "We expect him to put together policies and an agenda that will impact all of America and not just one special interest."
Is it not so sad?
Black folks still defend Obama to the hilt. It is so sad! It is clear our reality is shaped by whites. As Franz Fanon explained, blacks seek white validation. Ironically, these same black leaders used to assail Bush for making policies inimical to blacks. Now when their 'own' is there doing nothing for them, they excuse it with this nonsense. Jokers! I gave up on our people long ago. Whether they are in Africa or America or Europe, their minds are owned by white realities.
Sad Indeed
"I gave up on our people long ago.."
I can understand the sentiment, I'm getting pretty damn close to that conclusion myself. I would guess 92% of Blacks would follow Obama straight to hell. Of the other 8%, 2% are folks like us and 6% are Republican or Conservative.
I was talking to the "resident" Black militant last couple weeks, a young man with much anger at the "system" and the absentee local Black (mis)leadership. He talked about how he had seen Obama mentoring young Blacks in the South Side of Chicago, and I guess because he saw it with "his own eyes," his reality cannot be questioned. When I tried to articulate how Obama allowed Acorn to be f***ked, here was his response, in his own words, emphasis mine:
"From a tactical standpoint, silence appeared to be Obama's strongest response to the attack on Acorn. As we know, there are clear and obvious difference between Obama and both Bush 1 and 2. In that, both are white, rich and out of touch with the needs of poor America. Neither have advocated for the poor, nor have either affiliated themselves with an Acorn or similar organizations for that matter.
To defend accusations stemming from acts committed by members of Acorn would have been an act of political suicide. As a lawyer, he did what he was trained to do, gather the facts first and respond if appropriate afterwards.
In closing, I don't think that we need defend Obama for what he did or did not do. In the end, Acorn has an opportunity to come back bigger and better by highlighting the lies that was used an attempt to destroy them and the rationale behind the same."
Now this is the same Bro. who talks cash shit about the purported weakness, cowardice and ineptitude of local Black leaders who don't have a Harvard law degree nor a scintilla of the power of Obama. Sounds like a f***king lawyer himself: "In closing, I don't think we need to defend Obama for what he did or did not do." WTF? Break that down please??
I'm pretty much at the towel tossing point myself Fanon, the schizo shit that Blacks engage in to defend a "symbolic" Black who acts like a White boy is staggering. Let Obama save their asses, I'm done. I only blog here to kick it with like-minded folks, the dying minority of us who recognize it is what it is. When you email these sad Negroes or wannabe militants something that describes in detail how Obama's foreign policy is Bush 3, they shrug and dance a jig. They all Obama's Stepin Fetchit Club members. The Conservative rag the National Review calls Obama "Bush w/o a Stetson," how right they are. But tell that to the Stepin Fetchit club members.
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/04/09-4
http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NWY3NTQ0MDc4ZWY0MzJlYTU4ODM1MDF...
Here's the intro paragraph:
"There is much to criticize about President Obama on foreign policy, but increasingly, despite all the “reset button” rhetoric and the obligatory nods to the Left, his anti-terrorism policies are becoming near identical extensions (if in cynical fashion) of George Bush’s."
Now, if only the lying ass "Liberals" were as honest as the Conservatives. But don't count on that happening soon if at all.
p.s. Watch Obummer nominate some milquetoast White Boy or Girl to the Supremes, some bullshit "centrists." He wouldn't dare appoint a true liberal or a Black man or woman, but that's fine with the Stepin Fetchit crowd, they understand his "constraints," lol apparently the "King can do no wrong.."
My brother, I feel you!
Wife commented to me yesterday that I was the only black person who did not support Obama. It is clear any time you get in a gathering of brothers and sisters, 99.9 percent of them will be sing Obama choruses. Often, they are quick enough to claim how he is 'fixing' things while the right wing attempts to impede him. One African guy who was visiting from Holland attacked me for not being proud of our having a black President. The fact is most of these people are not intelligent enough. Or, they succumb their intelligence to delusional racial solidarity. These days, when confronted with these 'zombies', I turn the table on them by asking them whether any of them, when confronted with the gallows, would prefer a black executioner to a white one. They employ hackneyed lines to express their support for Obama while the evidence clearly shows there is no progress for them. At the victory ceremony in Chicago when Obama was elected, there was this brother who ran up and down on Michigan Avenue in Chicago shouting 'we are free; we are free'. Yes, a lot of blacks assert that with the ascendancy of Obama to the Presidency, we have shaken down the livery of oppression. We are a joke! I have lost a lot of friends because of my critique of that joker in the White House.
Barack, the magic Negro.
Barack, the magic Negro. What a fitting term.
You're right about the Supreme Court nominee. Bet good money it will be another corporatist disguised in "liberal" clothing.