The political Right has found the formula to split the Black vote just enough to nullify its unique impact. They have begun to navigate a deep current in historical Black political behavior, having discovered a near-Pavlovian response among some African Americans to the prospect of Black faces in high places, no matter what the content of the candidates character, associations, or policies. It is a response rooted in the long experience of Jim Crow segregation and near-absolute exclusion of Blacks from general civil society, which created an aching hunger for representation of any kind in the halls of power.  Our enemys have found the Black Achilles heel.

 

The GOP has no intention of recruiting Blacks en mass. It is the White Mans Party, a vehicle to mobilize whites against others mainly Blacks and, more recently, Latino immigrants in the service of a corporate agenda. Mass Black involvement in the Republican Party would defeat the purpose of the mechanism, and drive many whites to some other political formation. However, if historical Black political solidarity around progressive issues and candidates can be fractured, then the GOPs purpose will have been achieved.

 

White corporate Democrats, in their rush to retain white voters, have played into Republican hands. None of the four Democratic candidates for statewide office in Maryland were Black, despite the fact that a quarter of the states voters are African Americans which means that Blacks make up as much as 40 percent of Marylands Democrats. Thus, the most opportunistic elements of the Black political class were given a free pass to endorse Steele, the Republican, on the grounds that Democrats were taking Blacks for granted. Four county councilmen and one former county executive from Prince Georges County the most prosperous majority-Black county in the nation crossed the line.

 

Although Steele was defeated attracting much fewer white voters than Republican  Gov. Bob Ehrlich, who also lost the statisticians at the Republican National Committee could announce to their bosses that the GOP strategy of putting Black front men/women on the ticket is an effective way to ultimately destroy the Black political consensus.

 

They are betting that a substantial minority of African Americans care more about putting Black faces in high places than about the core issues that impact Black lives.

 

The vast majority of Black voters did not betray their own interests in Maryland, or Ohio, but the erosion of solidarity and political focus is evident. The Republican line which the five Prince Georges County Black Democrats bought into is that African Americans need to leverage their votes with the threat to switch parties. In reality, there is no choice at this time but to struggle for Black solidarity within the Democratic Party, based on principles of social and economic justice, racial equality, and world peace the cornerstones of the historical Black consensus. There is no room for such a dialogue in the GOP, whose intention is only to destroy the Black consensus and sweep African American politics into the dustbin of history through the deployment of Black Republican front men.  They are betting that a substantial minority of African Americans care more about putting Black faces in high places and avenging the slights and insults inflicted by white Democrats than about the core issues that impact Black lives: health care, housing, employment, the criminal justice system, and peace.

 

The Harold Ford Affair

 

The Black political class aspirants to money, power and media coverage has emerged as the push towards more rightwing political behavior among African Americans, the masses of whom have resisted becoming accomplices in their own destruction. A Reuters article titled Black Candidates Veer to Center meaning, to the right was carried by hundreds of newspapers across the country on November 12. Black candidates in the U.S. midterm elections moved toward the political center, seeking votes across the spectrum and playing down race, read the lead sentence.

 

There was in fact not much in the way of ideological difference to distinguish between Republican Bob Corker and Harold Ford.

 

No one exemplifies the disconnect between mass Black interests and the Black political class, than Harold Ford, Jr., the former congressman from Tennessee who lost his bid for a Senate seat last week. Ford managed to position himself as the most rightwing member of the Congressional Black Caucus, according to the twice-yearly scorecard of the CBC Monitor, a Black watchdog group. As BARs Bruce Dixon wrote last week, Ford is a pro-privatization, pro-torture, pro-war Bush sycophant craven enough to claim his own black grandmother was actually white to get a few more white votes.

 

Harold Ford has gone Republican in all but name. As the Memphis Flyer put it:

 

Beyond the convenient descriptors of race or party label, there was in fact not much in the way of ideological difference to distinguish between [Republican Bob] Corker and Ford.  Whatever their private convictions, both had progressively moved from their party's moderate wings to positions that were clearly right of center. 

 

Both candidates, formerly pro-choice on abortion, now described themselves as pro-life. Both opposed gay marriage. Both favored an extension of the Bush tax cuts, opposed immediate troops withdrawals from Iraq, and supported the president on the so-called torture bill. Their differences even on issues like tort reform and Social Security were even being fudged.

 

Writing in Time magazine, Ta-Nehisi Coates notes that Fords campaign

 

had no problem deploying the vague rhetoric of family, in hopes of demonstrating that a Democrat could be staunch in discriminating against gays. Ultimately Ford's hope was to build a rainbow coalition, one that would unite rednecks and the ghetto in mutual homophobia.

 

Yet the black political establishment as well as the Black masses, most of whom are unaware of how far Ford has traveled into enemy territory held their breath in hopes of Fords ascendance to the U.S. Senate. Another Black face in a high place!

 

Ford and his ilk would bring an end to Black politics.

 

From the standpoint of progressive Black politics, the outcome of last weeks elections was ideal: Democrats gained control of the Senate, while Harold Ford lost. We would not be burdened with an amoral man who aggressively marketed himself as a model for the new Black politics when in fact, Ford and his ilk would bring an end to Black politics and, therefore, the final defeat of progressive electoral politics in the United States.

 

Seeds of the Debacle

 

During the entire period from Emancipation to passage of the Voting Rights Act and other legislation that condemned Jim Crow to death, African Americans were rightfully consumed with the quest to break out of non-personhood, invisibility. Every personal, professional or political triumph of any Black individual was perceived as a victory for all African Americans. The very presence of a Black face in a high place was a cause for celebration and rightly so.

 

With Jim Crow in his grave in the late Sixties, African Americans suddenly faced a brand new world. Should the mass movement that had achieved this amazing triumph continue along its logical path the one outlined in speech after speech by Dr. Martin Luther King towards social and economic justice and peace? Or, should Blacks focus solely on taking advantage of their new opportunities within the existing social order, electing their own representatives, obtaining a fair share of contracts (for those in a position to bid), and glorying in a media exposure that had been unimaginable only a few years before.

 

The Black political class tied tightly to the Black business class and including many veterans of the Movement opted to shut down mass action. It was not in their interest to upset a status quo that they were eager to inhabit. The disconnect between the upwardly mobile classes and the Black masses a result of the death of Jim Crow became acute over the ensuing three decades, into the Nineties. But the fundamentals of the Black political consensus that had prevailed since Emancipation remained the guiding principles of Black politics. Until the mid-to-late-Nineties.

 

Every personal, professional or political triumph of any Black individual was perceived as a victory for all African Americans.

 

Corporate America woke up to realization that it had not used its vast resources to intervene in Black politics, effectively. The solid Black vote was an impediment to total corporate control of the United States, and had to be dismantled or made to appear so.  Black politicians emerged who distanced themselves from the historical Black consensus, and were rewarded handsomely by corporate donors and media. Barack Obama told the nation, at the 2004 Democratic convention, There is not a Black America and a White America and Latino America and Asian America theres the United States of America thus dismissing the African American world view and experience. By 2005, the Congressional Black Caucus was neutered, hopelessly split over issues pressed by corporations. The rot continues.

 

printer friendly (not active yet)

LISTEN TO THE LATEST BLACK AGENDA RADIO COMMENTARIES
November 15, 2006 America is willing to spend millions on monuments to Dr. King. But we spend next to nothing on solving the problems of poverty and want that defined his legacy. CLICK HERE TO LISTEN TO Millions on Monuments, Pennies on People by GLEN FORD	November 15, 2006 The HBO documentary "Hacking Democracy reveals that voting machines and the programs that run them can not only ADD votes, but SUBTRACT them too. CLICK HERE TO LISTEN to Subtracting the Vote by BRUCE DIXON CLICK HERE TO WATCH THE HBO FILM HACKING DEMOCRACY CLICK HERE TO VISIT THE HACKING DEMOCRACY WEBSITE with a wealth of interviews and additional materials.
November 8, 2006 What is facism? What would home-grown American facism look like, and how close is it right now? CLICK HERE TO LISTEN TO American Facism by GLEN FORD	November 8, 2006 The so-called war on terror is a palpable fraud. It is enemy propaganda that leaves us no choice but to vote for the politicians who can scare us the most. This is a contest Democrats cannot win and should not play. And we must not let them. CLICK HERE TO LISTEN to Ending the So-Called "War on Terror" by BRUCE DIXON
November 1, 2006 AMERICAN GENOCIDE When Columbus invaded America there were more than 15 million native Americans in what is now the U.S. By 1890 there were 300,000, a 97% death rate. Our nation sits on the bones on one of the greatest genocides in human history. CLICK HERE TO LISTEN TO THE ALL-AMERICAN GENOCIDE by GLEN FORD	November 1, 2006 WHERE IS THE BLACK CHURCH ON IRAQ? African Americans overwhelmingly oppose the war in IRaq, and have done so since its beginning. 650,000 Iraqis are now dead, compared to less than 3,000 Americans, a ratio of 200 to 1. Why then, do we allow black preachers in black churches to pray every Sunday ONLY for the Americans in harm's way and not for the other 99% of the dead, who are Iraqis?. CLICK HERE TO LISTEN to WHERE IS THE BLACK CHURCH ON IRAQ by BRUCE DIXON
October 25, 2006 MYTH OF THE MELTING POT White Americans frequently celebrate the US as a Melting Pot. The phrase is actually taken from an early 20th century play that lauds the US as a melting pot for it called the races of Europe alone, transforming them into what we now call white Americans. CLICK HERE TO LISTEN TO MYTH OF THE MELTING POT by GLEN FORD	October 25, 2006 WAR IS THE HEALTH OF THE STATE America's leaders need war, like vampires need blood. Even if it's war on a noun. In fact, in an era where politicians create and exploit fear to stay in power, the so-called war on terror is an invaluable political tool, something they cannot do without. CLICK HERE TO LISTEN to WAR IS THE HEALTH OF THE STATE by BRUCE DIXON